Prove f(P) = 0 for Any Point P in the Plane | Putnam A1 Question Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter john562
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving that if a real-valued function f satisfies the condition f(A) + f(B) + f(C) + f(D) = 0 for every square ABCD in the plane, then f(P) must equal 0 for any point P. The proof involves considering a square centered at point P and examining the midpoints of its sides, leading to a series of equations that ultimately show 0 = 4f(P). A participant expresses confusion about the reasoning behind the equations involving smaller squares within ABCD, questioning how their sums also equal zero. The conversation highlights the clarity of the proof while addressing the challenge some may face in understanding the logic behind it. The problem is noted as potentially one of the easier questions from the Putnam competition.
john562
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Question:
Let f be a real-valued function on the plane such that
for every square ABCD in the plane, f(A) + f(B) +
f(C) + f(D) = 0. Does it follow that f(P ) = 0 for all
points P in the plane?

Answer:
Yes, it does follow. Let P be any point in the plane. Let
ABCD be any square with center P . Let E; F; G; H
be the midpoints of the segments AB; BC; CD; DA,
respectively. The function f must satisfy the equations
0 = f(A) + f(B) + f(C) + f(D)
0 = f(E) + f(F ) + f(G) + f(H)
0 = f(A) + f(E) + f(P ) + f(H)
0 = f(B) + f(F ) + f(P ) + f(E)
0 = f(C) + f(G) + f(P ) + f(F )
0 = f(D) + f(H) + f(P ) + f(G):
If we add the last four equations, then subtract the first
equation and twice the second equation, we obtain 0 =
4f(P ), whence f(P ) = 0.

Comments:
I don't understand why
0 = f(A) + f(E) + f(P ) + f(H)
0 = f(B) + f(F ) + f(P ) + f(E)
0 = f(C) + f(G) + f(P ) + f(F )
0 = f(D) + f(H) + f(P ) + f(G)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Those are smaller squares within the larger square ABCD. To be specific, they are the four quarters of ABCD
 
I don't understand how adding them equals zero.
 
what is this? like the easiest putnam problem ever?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Back
Top