Prove f(P) = 0 for Any Point P in the Plane | Putnam A1 Question Help

  • Thread starter Thread starter john562
  • Start date Start date
john562
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
Question:
Let f be a real-valued function on the plane such that
for every square ABCD in the plane, f(A) + f(B) +
f(C) + f(D) = 0. Does it follow that f(P ) = 0 for all
points P in the plane?

Answer:
Yes, it does follow. Let P be any point in the plane. Let
ABCD be any square with center P . Let E; F; G; H
be the midpoints of the segments AB; BC; CD; DA,
respectively. The function f must satisfy the equations
0 = f(A) + f(B) + f(C) + f(D)
0 = f(E) + f(F ) + f(G) + f(H)
0 = f(A) + f(E) + f(P ) + f(H)
0 = f(B) + f(F ) + f(P ) + f(E)
0 = f(C) + f(G) + f(P ) + f(F )
0 = f(D) + f(H) + f(P ) + f(G):
If we add the last four equations, then subtract the first
equation and twice the second equation, we obtain 0 =
4f(P ), whence f(P ) = 0.

Comments:
I don't understand why
0 = f(A) + f(E) + f(P ) + f(H)
0 = f(B) + f(F ) + f(P ) + f(E)
0 = f(C) + f(G) + f(P ) + f(F )
0 = f(D) + f(H) + f(P ) + f(G)?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Those are smaller squares within the larger square ABCD. To be specific, they are the four quarters of ABCD
 
I don't understand how adding them equals zero.
 
what is this? like the easiest putnam problem ever?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top