Prove Integrability of a Discontinuous Function

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving the integrability of a discontinuous function defined on the interval [0,1]. The function takes the value 1 at points of the form 1/n for natural numbers n, and 0 elsewhere. The context is Riemann integrability, with a focus on establishing a suitable partition to demonstrate integrability.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the application of the Riemann integrability theorem and the nature of the function's upper and lower sums. There are attempts to find a partition that satisfies the conditions for integrability, with some questioning the necessity of considering the density of irrationals.

Discussion Status

The discussion includes various approaches to establishing the integrability of the function, with some participants providing hints and others sharing their solutions. There is recognition of multiple methods to tackle the problem, but no explicit consensus has been reached on a singular approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of selecting an appropriate partition and the implications of the function's discontinuities. There is mention of a hint provided by the professor, which influences some of the reasoning presented.

Lazerlike42
Messages
20
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let f(x)= { 1 if x=[tex]\frac{1}{n}[/tex] for some n[tex]\in[/tex] the natural numbers,
or 0 otherwise}

Prove f is integrable on [0,1], and evaluate the integral.

Homework Equations



This is using Riemann Integrability. I know that the method of providing the solution is supposed to be by application of the following theorem:

"A bounded function f is integrable on [a,b] if and only if [tex]\forall \epsilon > 0[/tex], there is a partition [tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex] of [a,b] where U(f, [tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex]) - L(f,[tex]P_{\epsilon} < \epsilon[/tex]"

U([tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex]) and L([tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex]) are of course the upper and lower sums.

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that L([tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex]) is 0 everywhere, because for any sub-interval no matter how small there is some value of x where x /= [tex]\frac{1}{n}[/tex]. I also know that the integral must equal 0, as the lower and upper sums must be equal in an integrable function.

What I am supposed to do is to find some partition of [a,b] where the upper sum is less than epsilon, but I can't figure out how to do that.

Given an epsilon, if I select some x0 where x0=[tex]\frac{1}{m}[/tex] for some m and x0 < [tex]\epsilon[/tex], then it follows that the upper sum over [0,x0] < [tex]\epsilon[/tex]. The issue is then the upper sum on [x0, 1].

I have also noticed this fact: Suppose my x0=[tex]\frac{1}{500}[/tex]. Then if I move up to [tex]\frac{2}{500}[/tex], that's actually [tex]\frac{1}{250}[/tex]. Similarly, [tex]\frac{4}{500}=\frac{1}{125}[/tex], [tex]\frac{5}{500}=\frac{1}{100}[/tex], and [tex]\frac{10}{500}={\frac{1}{50}[/tex]. That means that between [tex]\frac{2}{500}[/tex] and [tex]\frac{1}{50}[/tex], there are only 4 values equal to some [tex]\frac{1}{n}[/tex]. The upper sum over that would then be simply 4 * [tex]\frac{1}{500}[/tex]. Somewhere in all of that, I feel like there is a way to partition [x0, 1] so that it's less than a given epsilon, but I can't figure it out.

Thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For each integer M>0, pick an interval around each x=1/n of size 1/2^(n+M). You can do that, right? What happens as M->infinity?
 
Ok, here is the solution I came up with. Any comments are appreciated.

By the given theorem, a bounded function f is integrable on [a,b] if and only if [tex]\forall \epsilon > 0 \exists[/tex] some partition [tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex] of [a,b] such that [tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon})-L(f,P_{\epsilon}) < \epsilon[/tex].


Clearly the function f(x) is bounded, having only two possible values: 0 and 1.


So Consider [tex]L(f,P_{\epsilon})[/tex] for an arbitrary partition. Because the irrationals are dense on [tex]\Re[/tex], for any sub-interval [tex][x_{k},x_{k-1}] \exists x_{0}[/tex] such that [tex]x_{0}\neq\frac{1}{n}[/tex] for any n[tex]\in[/tex] the naturals. Therefore, the [tex]L(f,P_{\epsilon})=0 \forall\epsilon[/tex]


Then by the theorem, f is integrable if [tex]\forall \epsilon >0 \exists[/tex] a partition [tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex] such that [tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon}) < \epsilon[/tex]



Choose some [tex]x_{1}[/tex]such that [tex]x_{1}=\frac{1}{m}[/tex] for some [tex]m\in[/tex] the naturals and [tex]x_{1} < \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]. We must produce a partition [tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex] such that [tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon}) < \epsilon[/tex]. For now, consider [tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex] only over the interval [0,x1], and define [tex]P_{\epsilon}=[/tex]{[tex]{0,x_{1}[/tex]}. On [0,x1], [tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon})=1(x_{1}-0)=x_{1}[/tex]

Now consider [x1,1]. In [x1,1] there are only m numbers of the form [tex]\frac{1}{n}[/tex] for some n: x1 (which is, as we chose it, [tex]\frac{1}{m}[/tex]), [tex]\frac{1}{m-1}[/tex], [tex]\frac{1}{m-2}[/tex]...1. Define [tex]P_{\epsilon}[/tex] over [x1,1] so as to satisfy the property that each number of the form [tex]\frac{1}{n}[/tex] (call them [tex]\frac{1}{n_{k}}[/tex]) is in a subinterval as follows:

[[tex]\frac{1}{n_{k}}-\frac{1}{2m^{2}}, \frac{1}{n_{k}}+\frac{1}{2m^{2}}[/tex]] (except for x1 and 1, the intervals for which need be defined only on the right and left sides, respectively). So for example, if x1=[tex]\frac{1}{5}[/tex], ensure that [tex]\frac{1}{4}[/tex] is in the sub-interval [0.23,0.27].

More specifically, [tex]P_{\epsilon}=[/tex]{[tex]0, x_{1}, \frac{1+m}{m^{2}}, \frac{1}{m-1}-\frac{1}{2m^{2}},\frac{1}{m-1}+\frac{1}{2m^{2}},\frac{1}{m-2}-\frac{1}{2m^{2}}...1-\frac{1}{2m^{2}},1[/tex]}

Then over [x1,1], [tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon})[/tex]=

[tex]1( \frac{1+m}{m^{2}}-\frac{1}{m})+0(\frac{1}{m-1}-\frac{1}{2m^{2}}-[ \frac{1+m}{m^{2}}])+1(\frac{1}{m-1}+\frac{1}{2m^{2}}-[\frac{1}{m-1}-\frac{1}{2m^{2}}])+0(\frac{1}{m-2}-\frac{1}{2m^{2}}-[\frac{1}{m-1}+\frac{1}{2m^{2}}]...+1(1-[1-\frac{1}{2,^{2}}])[/tex]

=[tex]\frac{1}{2m^{2}}+\frac{1}{m^{2}}+\frac{1}{m^{2}}+...+\frac{1}{2m^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]=(m-1)(\frac{1}{m^{2}})=\frac{1}{m}-\frac{1}{m^{2}} = x_{1}-\frac{1}{m^{2}}[/tex]

[tex]<x_{1}<\frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]

Also, over [0,x1], [tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon}) = x_{1} < \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex], as we saw above.

Then [tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon})[/tex] over [0,1]=[tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon})[/tex] over [0,x1]+[tex]U(f,P_{\epsilon})[/tex] over [x1,1]

[tex]<\frac{\epsilon}{2}+\frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]
[tex]<\epsilon[/tex]

Therefore, f is integrable over [0,1]
 
Dick, I saw your hint when I had just finished posting my solution. Thanks! It looks like I had the same general idea as you hinted at, but I'm not sure if what I did is precisely the same.
 
It's way simpler than you think, I think. Just pick a value of M based on epsilon. You don't need stuff like the density of irrationals. Sorry, but I can't read your post. Too tired.
 
Dick said:
It's way simpler than you think, I think. Just pick a value of M based on epsilon. You don't need stuff like the density of irrationals. Sorry, but I can't read your post. Too tired.

That's ok. I'm satisfied with what I've got so far... I see what you're saying. There are obviously a few ways to do it (I can think of a couple of others right now which involve approaching it from other angles, like countability), but the professor gave us a hint and I based my work off of that... I'm also too tired to bother thinking about whether your hint fits in with hers, but I'll take another look in the morning.
 
Fair enough. Like you, I can only read about 6 lines before I doze off.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K