Prove Minkowski Inequality using Cauchy-Schwartz Inequality

Rederick
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
I expanded (x+y),(x+y) and got x^2+y^2 > 2xy then replaced 2xy with 2|x,y| but now I'm stuck.

I need to get it to ||x+y|| <= ||x|| + ||y||. Am I close?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Here's what I did so far...

Let x=(x1,x2..xn) and y=(y1,y2..yn) in R. Assume x,y not = 0. Then (x+y)dot(x+y) = sum(x^2+2xy+y^2) >= 0. Then I rewrote it as sum(x^2 +y^2) >= sum(2xy). Using Cauchy Schwartz Inequality, sum(2xy) = 2|x dot y| <=2( ||x|| ||y||). So now I have this:

sum(x^2) +sum(y^2) <= 2( ||x|| ||y||).

I'm not even sure I'm doing the right thing. Can anyone help?
 
Start with \|x+y\|^2. This is less than what?

I'm assuming that what you're trying to prove is that

|\langle x,y\rangle|\leq \|x\|\|y\|\Rightarrow \|x+y\|\leq\|x\|+\|y\|

I'm not familiar with the term "Minkowski inequality". I would call the inequality on the right the "triangle inequality". (Edit: Aha, it's the triangle inequality for a specific Hilbert space).

By the way, if you click the quote button next to this post, you can see how I did the LaTeX. Keep in mind that there's a bug that causes the wrong images to appear in previews most of the time, so you will need to refresh and resend after each preview.
 
Last edited:
Thank you Fredrik. I got it.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top