Prove or disprove about Dual space

  • Thread starter Thread starter TZenith
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Dual Space
TZenith
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. X : Banach space

Z : closed subspace of X

Prove or disprove that X* ⊆ Z*

where Z* and X* are dual space of Z and X, respectively.

2. X : normed space and f : X → R : linear functional.

Assume that ∃a∈X and r∈(0,1] such that f(B(a,r))=R(Real numbers)

where B(a,r) is open ball. Prove that f is discontinuous

Proof. 2) I think it must suppose f is continuous and find a contradiction with f(B(a,r))=R

But I can't find some contradiction.

1) We think it doesn't satisfy X* ⊆ Z*. But we will show X* ⊆ Z* and find some contradiction. Let f ∈ X*. Thus f : X → R is bounded linear functional. We must to show that f : Z → R is bounded linear functional or find some contradiction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You have that Z \subseteq X right? Linear functionals must be linear maps into \mathbb R for all elements on which they act. A way of thinking about this is that the bigger a space is, the more restrictions are imposed on the dual functions, hence we would suspect that the dual spaces reverse inclusion!

Now check this. As you started, let f \in X^* so that f^*: X \to \mathbb R is linear and bounded. You want to know how it acts on a closed subspace of X. So first of all, could the function fail to be linear? Secondly, could the function fail to be bounded?

For the second question, think about the definition of continuity. The function f is continuous at a if for all \epsilon >0 there exists \delta >0 such that f(B(a,\delta)) \subseteq B(f(a),\epsilon). Could you function be continuous at 'a'? Why or why not?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top