MHB Prove Probability: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter Niamh1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Probability Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a probability statement using the binomial theorem, specifically the equation (x+y)^n = Σ(n choose k)x^ky^(n-k). Participants explore the implications of setting x=1 and y=1, leading to the result 2^n. A key point made is the derivation of the sum S = Σ(r * (n choose r)), which connects to the binomial theorem and ultimately shows that 2S = n2^n. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the relationship between the summation and the binomial theorem to achieve the proof. The discussion concludes with a focus on the method of connecting these mathematical concepts.
Niamh1
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
View attachment 6593

Prove the following

I literally have no idea where to start or what to do.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (189).png
    Screenshot (189).png
    2.4 KB · Views: 101
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi there. :)

The binomial theorem states that $$(x+y)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}x^ky^{n-k}$$. What happens if you let $x=1$ and $y=1$?
 
Jameson said:
Hi there. :)

The binomial theorem states that $$(x+y)^n = \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}x^ky^{n-k}$$. What happens if you let $x=1$ and $y=1$?

Doesn't really help me to be honest.
 
Hi Niamh,

Let $S = \sum_{r = 1}^n r\binom{n}{r}$. Then

$$S = 0\binom{n}{0} + 1\binom{n}{1} + 2\binom{n}{2} + \cdots + (n-1)\binom{n}{n-1} + n\binom{n}{n}$$
$$S = n\binom{n}{n} + (n-1)\binom{n}{n-1} + \cdots + 1\binom{n}{1} + 0\binom{n}{0}$$

Using the fact that $\binom{n}{r} = \binom{n}{n-r}$ for $0 \le r \le n$, add the two equations column-wise, then use the binomial theorem, to obtain $2S = n2^n$. Dividing by $2$ yields the result.
 
Here's another easy proof using calculus:

$$(x+1)^n=\sum_{r=0}^n{{n}\choose{r}}x^r$$

Take derivatives:

$$n(x+1)^{n-1}=\sum_{r=1}^nr{{n}\choose{r}}x^{r-1}$$

Eavaluate at x=1:

$$n2^{n-1}=\sum_{r=1}^nr{{n}\choose{r}}=\sum_{r=0}^nr{{n}\choose{r}}$$
 
Niamh said:
Doesn't really help me to be honest.

Hi Niamh,

My post and the two below show the main connection you need, that is how to connect the summation sign to something resembling $2^n$. At first glance this is a quite strange equation and the key is the binomial theorem as I mentioned. If you let $x=1$ and $y=1$ you get:

$$(x+y)^n =(1+1)^n=2^n= \sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}x^ky^{n-k}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}1^k1^{n-k}=\sum_{k=0}^{n}\binom{n}{k}$$

Using this trick we have now connected $2^n$ to something with this summation. That was the idea behind my post. :)

What have you tried?
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top