Prove: Square Can Be Partitioned into n Smaller Squares for n > 14

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that a square can be partitioned into n smaller squares for integers n greater than 14. The initial approach suggests using mathematical induction, with some success noted for n = 15 and n = 17, but challenges arise with n = 16. There is uncertainty about the definition of partitioning into smaller squares, particularly regarding how different square sizes contribute to the total count. Participants seek visual representations to clarify the problem and explore the implications of modulo 3 in the proof. Overall, the conversation highlights the complexities involved in establishing a rigorous proof for this mathematical assertion.
CoachZ
Messages
26
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



For n>14 such that n is an integer, prove that a square can be partitioned into n smaller squares...

Homework Equations



None...

The Attempt at a Solution



I was thinking this would be somewhat of an induction proof because we are working our way up to n. So far, I've found when n = 15, n = 17, but somehow n = 16 is eluding me at the moment. I'm just trying to see what it would look like if I were to do this visually, however my assumption is that this has to deal with modulo 3 in some form or another. How this works into a proof is also something that is eluding me. Any suggestions would be warmly welcomed!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry I can't be of much help, but at first sight a proof by induction seems impossible. Because suppose you have shown that if it is possible for n, then it can also be done for n + 1.
Clearly, for n = 4 the statement is true (or even for n = 1, if you want). Also, what do you mean by "partition into smaller squares"? Does that count all squares? For example, when you draw a 3x3 grid in the square, does that give 9 squares? Or does that give 9 (1x1) squares + 4 (2x2) squares = 13 in total?
Also, can you post an image for n = 15, just to get the problem clear?
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top