I Prove that A:B is greater than C:D?

  • I
  • Thread starter Thread starter Julia Coggins
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Mathematics Theory
Julia Coggins
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
From "Road to Reality" chapter 3 part two. If three ratios are known: M:N, A:B, C:D. A:B is greater than C:D if: A added to itself M times exceeds B added to itself N times and D added to itself N times exceeds C added to itself M times. Show that the ratio A:B is greater than C:D.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I believe this should be posted in maths forum.
Based on the data,
A(M+1)>B(N+1) and D(N+1)>C(M+1)
So,
A/B>(N+1)/(M+1)...(1)
and
C/D<(N+1)/(M+1)...(2)
1 and 2 clearly prove A:B>C:D.
 
Thank you, it does belong to the mathematics category, but I'm unsure how to change it
 
Julia Coggins said:
but I'm unsure how to change it
You can't change it once you've posted it. A mentor will fix it.
 
Ah I see. Once again, thank you, I suppose for some reason I struggled with an otherwise simple question.
 
cnh1995 said:
I believe this should be posted in maths forum.
Based on the data,
A(M+1)>B(N+1) and D(N+1)>C(M+1)
So,
A/B>(N+1)/(M+1)...(1)
and
C/D<(N+1)/(M+1)...(2)
1 and 2 clearly prove A:B>C:D.
This is assuming all the numbers involved are positive.
 
  • Like
Likes member 587159 and cnh1995
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top