Prove that if m is the average of x1,x2, ,xk, then

  • Thread starter Thread starter blashmet
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Average
blashmet
Messages
15
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/9242/captureyeq.jpg

Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Homework Equations



Given in problem statement.

The Attempt at a Solution



Basically I've come up with the contrapositive, but I'm unsure of how to proceed with the proof. Can anyone help?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
So x_1, x_2, ..., x_k are all less than m. You're trying to show that m cannot be (x_1 + x_2 +...+ x_k)/k. What can you say about the sum x_1 + x_2 +... + x_k?
 
murmillo said:
So x_1, x_2, ..., x_k are all less than m. You're trying to show that m cannot be (x_1 + x_2 +...+ x_k)/k. What can you say about the sum x_1 + x_2 +... + x_k?


(x_1 + x_2 +... + x_k) is greater than (x_1 + x_2 +...+ x_k)/k ?


thanks for the help btw :)
 
Here are some more hints:

Yes, (x_1 + x_2 +... + x_k) is greater than (x_1 + x_2 +...+ x_k)/k. But I think that's true in general, since basically whenever you divide something by a positive integer greater than 1 you make it smaller. But we want to somehow use the fact that x_1, x_2,...,x_k are all less than m. Is there anything you can say about the sum that involves m? Remember that we're trying to show that m cannot be the sum divided by k. Think it over for a while and see if you can come up with something. Also if you really get stuck, maybe play around with some examples, like k = 5 or something and then make something up for x_1 to x_k...I dunno. Anyway, good luck!
 
Those are exactly my thoughts. It makes sense intuitively, I just don't know how to put it down in "math speak" haha.

If anyone can help that'd be sweet...
 
Hi,

OK, one more hint until I'm off to do other things:
Each of the x's are less than m. And there are k of them. So when you add all the x's together, what can you say? I mean, you want to show that m cannot be the sum of the x's divided by k. That's the same as: m times k is not the sum of the x's.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top