Prove That If rv = 0 Then Either r=0 or v=0

broegger
Messages
257
Reaction score
0
how do you prove that if v is an element of V (a vector space), and if r is a scalar and if rv = 0, then either r = 0 or v = 0... it seems obvious, but i have no idea how to prove it...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If v is the vector (a, b, c), then the vector that results from the multiplication rv is (ra, rb, rc). If the result is equal to 0, the zero vector, then (ra, rb, rc) = (0, 0, 0). If we write this formally we get:
ra = 0
rb = 0
rc = 0
The solution is that either r equals 0, or a, b, and c all equal 0. And if a, b, and c are 0 then the vector v is (0, 0, 0) which is the zero vector.

Is this proof satisfactory? There are probably a lot of ways to prove this. :smile:
 
That proof requires you to pick a basis. If I pick a different basis, do you know that it still holds?

Here's the basis free proof. Suppose rv=0, then if r is zero we are done, if not multiply rv=0 by 1/r and we see v=0.
 
matt grime said:
That proof requires you to pick a basis. If I pick a different basis, do you know that it still holds?
Yes... if you pick your basis at (A, B, C) then the vector v becomes (a - A, b - B, c - C) and the zero vector is now (A, B, C).
r(a - A) = A
r(b - B) = B
r(c - C) = C
For this to be true for r <> 0, a must equal A, b must equal B and c must qual C, and thus the vector v becomes (A, B, C) which is again the zero vector.
 
No, that isn't how one does a change of basis (of a vector space: the origin isn't fixed.)
 
It's also dimension dependent. The result is true for every vector space, even those where picking a basis, never mind solving an uncountable set of linear equations requires the axiom of choice.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top