Prove that the length of this curve is decreasing

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves proving that the length of a curve decreases as a parameter, t, increases. The context is centered around the mathematical formulation of the curve's length as a function of t, specifically through the use of integrals and derivatives.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the need to show that the derivative of the length with respect to t is negative. There is mention of using the mean-value theorem and attempts to manipulate the problem using given assumptions and hints.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various strategies and questioning the relevance of the provided information. Some guidance has been offered regarding the importance of using all assumptions, but no consensus has been reached on a specific approach.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the necessity of considering the assumptions stated in the problem and express uncertainty about how to effectively apply the mean-value theorem in this context.

chipotleaway
Messages
174
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The problem asks us to prove the length of a curve decreases as one of its parameters, t, increases. Here is the full statement

http://img94.imageshack.us/img94/6560/yf6j.jpg

Homework Equations


[tex]L_t=\int_0^1 ||\partial_s x(t,s)||ds[/tex] is the length of the curve as a function of t, for all t greater than 0.

[tex]\partial_t L_t=\int_0^1 \partial_t ||\partial_s x(t,s)||ds[/tex] is the derivative of the length of the curve with respect to t.


The Attempt at a Solution


To show that the length L(t) decreases as t increases, I think we have to show that the derivative of the length L(t) with respect to t is negative, that is, [tex]\partial_t L_t=\int_0^1 \partial_t ||\partial_s x(t,s)||ds < 0[/tex] is negative.

The only strategy I have for the moment is the mean-value theorem which I've seen used to prove inequalities before (e.g. show that sin(x)<x for all x) but so far, I'm still a bit unclear on how to apply it to this situation. The other attempt I've tried was to take the hint, do some substitutions and hope something will pop out but for a 3 mark question, there's no way this method alone will work. I'm also not yet able to see how the information at the start is relevant to doing this problem.

Any helpful pointers will be greatly appreciated, thanks!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You have to use all of the given assumptions ... see the "givens" at the bottom of the problem statement!
 
I've used both the assumption and the hint in my attempt to manipulate it into something I can apply the MVT to...but I'm not sure if this is going down the right path or not, and also I don't have a clear idea of how to get a the desired inequality out of it.
 
Any more suggestions, anyone?
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K