Prove that two definite integrals are equal

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality of two definite integrals involving square roots and exponential functions. The integrals are defined over different intervals and involve transformations of variables.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore substitution methods, particularly using the transformation \( t = e^t \) and changing the bounds of integration. There are discussions about the implications of Riemann sums and their convergence in relation to the equality of the integrals.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes various attempts at substitution and transformation, with some participants questioning the effectiveness of these methods. There is no explicit consensus on the best approach, but several suggestions have been made regarding the use of Riemann sums and variable changes.

Contextual Notes

Participants express uncertainty about the appropriateness of certain methods and the complexity involved in manipulating Riemann sums, particularly for non-polynomial functions. There are also references to previous experiences with homework rules and concerns about potential infractions for sharing solutions.

Char. Limit
Gold Member
Messages
1,222
Reaction score
23

Homework Statement


I want to prove the following statement:

[tex]\int_0^{ln(2)} \sqrt{e^{2t} + 4 e^{4t} + 9 e^{6t}} dt = \int_1^2 \sqrt{1 + 4 t^2 + 9 t^4} dt[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



To be honest, I'm not sure how to do this. I tried a substitution [tex]t=e^t[/tex] for the second integral, but it didn't really go all that well. How do you do this, assuming that direct calculation is not allowed?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let e^t = x.
Then e^t*dt = dx,

When t = 0, x = 1 and when t = ln(2), x = 2.
Substitute these values in the given integration.
Then replace x by t, because the definite integration does not depend on the variables whether it is x or t or any other.
 
Factor out [tex]e^{2t}[/tex] of the first integral and make t= e^t and change the bounds of integration.
 
Char. Limit said:

Homework Statement


I want to prove the following statement:

[tex]\int_0^{ln(2)} \sqrt{e^{2t} + 4 e^{4t} + 9 e^{6t}} dt = \int_1^2 \sqrt{1 + 4 t^2 + 9 t^4} dt[/tex]


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



To be honest, I'm not sure how to do this. I tried a substitution [tex]t=e^t[/tex] for the second integral, but it didn't really go all that well. How do you do this, assuming that direct calculation is not allowed?

I seem to remember if you have two Riemann sums R1 and R2 if they converge to the same point then they are equal. Could this be used here?
 
Last edited:
╔(σ_σ)╝ said:
Factor out [tex]e^{2t}[/tex] of the first integral and make t= e^t and change the bounds of integration.
It's less confusing to use a different variable; say, u = e^t.
 
Susanne217 said:
I seem to remember if you have two Riemann sums R1 and R2 if they converge to the same point then they are equal. Could this be used here?
A better approach is to follow the advice given by rl.bhat and ╔(σ_σ)╝.
 
Mark44 said:
A better approach is to follow the advice given by rl.bhat and ╔(σ_σ)╝.

Why is that? Cause if the Riemann sums Converge to the same number then integrals are equal aren't they? Maybe I'm just a silly girl.
 
Susanne217 said:
Why is that? Cause if the Riemann sums Converge to the same number then integrals are equal aren't they? Maybe I'm just a silly girl.
First of all you have to write out the riemann sums and show it converges to something and write out down the something.

Then you have to prove the two riemann sums are equal.
 
Mark44 said:
A better approach is to follow the advice given by rl.bhat and ╔(σ_σ)╝.

╔(σ_σ)╝ said:
First of all you have to write out the riemann sums and show it converges to something and write out down the something.

Then you have to prove the two riemann sums are equal.

Well then I wasn't far of was I ? ;)
 
  • #10
Susanne217 said:
Well then I wasn't far of was I ? ;)
Well your suggestion was not "wrong". However, it will not be helpful to the OP as the technicality involving your suggestion require a lot of work. And remember the riemann sum ,by definition, is not something you can easily manipulate. When you have functions that are not polynomials , integrating from the definition becomes non trivial even for relatively "simple" functions.

How about you try out your suggestion and see if it works out well.:-)
 
  • #11
╔(σ_σ)╝ said:
Well your suggestion was not "wrong". However, it will not be helpful to the OP as the technicality involving your suggestion require a lot of work. And remember the riemann sum ,by definition, is not something you can easily manipulate. When you have functions that are not polynomials , integrating from the definition becomes non trivial even for relatively "simple" functions.

How about you try out your suggestion and see if it works out well.:-)

If I do I will properly get an infraction...
 
  • #12
You don't have to post it here and even if you do, you would not get an infraction. Just confess if you cannot do it.
 
  • #13
╔(σ_σ)╝ said:
You don't have to post it here and even if you do, you would not get an infraction. Just confess if you cannot do it.

I posted something simular last year and got an infraction so. But yes I could do it...
 
  • #14
Do it and send it as a private message to me :-).
Perhaps you have some clever tricks that are worth seeing.
 
  • #15
╔(σ_σ)╝ said:
Do it and send it as a private message to me :-).
Perhaps you have some clever tricks that are worth seeing.

If you can solve the differential in my other post, then we have a deal.
 
  • #16
Susanne217 said:
If you can solve the differential in my other post, then we have a deal.
If you mean your non linear differential equation then, no. I do not know how to solve it. I haven't taking any courses on non linear differential equations neither am I interested in learning how to do so, atm.
 
  • #17
Susanne217 said:
If you can solve the differential in my other post, then we have a deal.
If you mean your non linear differential equation then, no. I do not know how to solve it. I haven't taking any courses on non linear differential equations neither am I interested in learning how to do so, atm.
I know my limitations.:-)
 
  • #18
╔(σ_σ)╝ said:
If you mean your non linear differential equation then, no. I do not know how to solve it. I haven't taking any courses on non linear differential equations neither am I interested in learning how to do so, atm.

yeah it was this one here

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=431007

OKay fair enough..
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K