Prove v = u(ktu^3 + 1)^1/3 & x = (1/2ku^2)((ktu^3 + 1)^2/3 - 1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter SherlockOhms
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Medium
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the equations v = u(ktu^3 + 1)^(1/3) and x = (1/2ku^2)((ktu^3 + 1)^(2/3) - 1) in the context of an object experiencing deceleration proportional to the fourth power of its velocity. The initial conditions are set with v at time 0 equal to u and x at time 0 equal to 0. The user has successfully derived the first equation for v but struggles with the integration needed for x, mistakenly differentiating u^3. They seek clarification on the correct approach to the second part, indicating a need for a substitution or integration technique. The conversation highlights the importance of careful differentiation and integration in solving physics problems involving motion through resisting media.
SherlockOhms
Messages
309
Reaction score
0
Question:
When an object travels through a certain resisting medium the deceleration is proportional to the 4th of the velocity. This, a = -kv^4. Prove v = u(ktu^3 + 1)^1/3 and subsequently x = (1/2ku^2)((ktu^3 + 1)^2/3 - 1).
v at time 0 = u and x at time 0 = 0.

Equations:
Differentiation and integration.

Attempt at solution:
I've proved the first part, for v. I keep getting (1/6ku)((ktu^3 + 1)^2/3 - 1) for c though. So, not too far out. It should just be a simple u substitution following on from the derivation of v. Could anyone walk through the second part? I have no clue where I'm making the mistake.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
To make things easier to understand (as sometimes you might see 'u' to indicate a variable function for velocity)

ku^3 = A and u=B

So you have

v= dx/dt = B(At+1)1/3


To solve this you can use another substitution or apply the direct formula for

\int (ax+b)^n dx
 
I see where I went wrong. Made a stupid blunder and differentiated the u^3 for some reason. Wasn't thinking. Thanks for that.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top