Prove Van Leeuwen's Theorem: Diamagnetism Does Not Exist in Classical Physics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Henk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Theorem
Henk
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
For a statistical mechanics course we have to prove Van Leeuwen's theorem: Diamagnetism does not exist in classical physics.

I know that in an external magnetic field H the Hamiltonian Ha goes from Ha(p1,p2,--------,pN ,q1,q2,-------qN) to Ha(p1-(e/c)A1, p2-(e/c)A2, ------- pN-(e/c)AN, q1,q2,------.qN)

I also know that the induced magnetization M = kT*d(log QN)/dH

So the problem is finding QN. I know how to calculate it for a perfect gas without the magnetic field but I can't seem to solve the integral when Ha changes.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Try shifting integration variables.
 
Ah I found bij changing p - (e/c)A to p' and then integrating. Thanks a lot.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top