Prove whether or not a transformation is one to one.

In summary, to determine if the transformation T defined by T\begin{bmatrix}a \\ b \\ c \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}a- b & b- c \\ a+ b & b+ c\end{bmatrix} is one-to-one, we must find its kernel. The transformation is one-to-one if and only if the kernel is {0}.
  • #1
thatguythere
91
0

Homework Statement


Let T: R3 -> M22 by
T\begin{bmatrix}
a \\
b \\
c
\label{T}
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
a-b & b-c \\
a+b & b+c\\
\end{bmatrix}

Is this transformation one-to-one?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not really certain how to go about this. A nudge in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
thatguythere said:

Homework Statement


Let T: R3 -> M22 by
T\begin{bmatrix}
a \\
b \\
c
\label{T}
\end{bmatrix}
=
\begin{bmatrix}
a-b & b-c \\
a+b & b+c\\
\end{bmatrix}

Is this transformation one-to-one?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I am not really certain how to go about this. A nudge in the right direction?

A linear transformation is one-to-one if it's kernel is {0}. Try computing the kernel.
 
  • #3
First, use "tex" and "/tex" at the beginning and end of an entire equation, not for individual parts:
[tex]T\begin{bmatrix}a \\ b \\ c \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}a- b & b- c \\ a+ b & b+ c\end{bmatrix}[/tex].

Now, can we assume that you understand what "one to one" means? T is one to one if Tu= Tv only if u= v. Taking
[tex]u= \begin{bmatrix}a \\ b \\ c\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
and
[tex]v=\begin{bmatrix}x \\ y \\ z\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
then Tu= Tv means that
[tex]\begin{bmatrix}a- b & b- c \\ a+ b & b+ c\end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}x- y & y- z \\ x+ y & y+ z\end{bmatrix}[/tex]
which is the same as a- b= x- y, b- c= y- z, a+ b= x+ y, and b+ c= y+ z.

Can you prove from those equations that a= x, b= y, and c= z?
(Dick's method is equivalent to this, taking x= y= z= 0.)
 
  • #4
So if T(u) = T(v) then 0 = T(u)-T(v) = T(u-v) so u-v is in kerT and u-v=0 so u=v?
But only if the kerT=0.
 
Last edited:
  • #5
thatguythere said:
So if T(u) = T(v) then 0 = T(u)-T(v) = T(u-v) so u-v is in kerT and u-v=0 so u=v?
But only if the kerT=0.

That's it exactly. So just find ker(T).
 

1. What does it mean for a transformation to be one to one?

A one to one transformation is a function that maps each element of the input set to a unique element in the output set. In other words, no two different inputs can result in the same output.

2. How can I prove whether or not a transformation is one to one?

To prove that a transformation is one to one, you can use the horizontal line test. If a horizontal line intersects the graph of the function at more than one point, then the function is not one to one.

3. Can a transformation be both one to one and onto?

Yes, a transformation can be both one to one and onto. A function that is both one to one and onto is called a bijection.

4. Are there any other methods to prove whether or not a transformation is one to one?

Yes, there are other methods to prove whether or not a transformation is one to one, such as using algebraic methods or using the inverse of the function.

5. Is it possible for a transformation to be one to one in some cases but not in others?

Yes, it is possible for a transformation to be one to one in some cases but not in others. For example, a transformation may be one to one on a restricted domain, but not on the entire input set.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
388
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
906
Back
Top