Proving 0.99999... = 1: A Wikipedia Insight

  • Thread starter Thread starter nazgjunk
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Insight Wikipedia
nazgjunk
Messages
88
Reaction score
0
0.99999... = 1?

I found the following proof on Wikipedia. It looks fine, but I can hardly imagine it to be right...

Another kind of proof adapts to any repeating decimal. When a fraction in decimal notation is multiplied by 10, the digits do not change but the decimal separator moves one place to the right. Thus 10 × 0.9999… equals 9.9999…, which is 9 more than the original number. Subtracting the smaller number from the larger can proceed digit by digit; the result is 9 − 9, which is 0, in each of the digits after the decimal separator. But trailing zeros do not change a number, so the difference is exactly 9. The final step uses algebra. Let the decimal number in question, 0.9999…, be called c. Then 10c − c = 9. This is the same as 9c = 9. Dividing both sides by 9 completes the proof: c = 1.

You can find the full article http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proof_that_0.999..._equals_1" .
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
"I do not understand it, therefore it must be wrong!"

It assumes some technical facts but it is, in fact, completely valid. Why do you say "I can hardly imagine it to be right..."??

Would you have a problem with this: if x= 0.3333... then 10x= 3.3333333... so, subtracting, 9x= 3 and x= 1/3. Would it surprise you to learn that 1/3= 0.3333...? If not why does it bother you to learn that
3/3= 0.99999...?

This thread has been locked since it has all been said before. Look in the archives:
https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=5513
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
4K
2
Replies
91
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
5K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Back
Top