Proving A,B and C are Collinear

  • Thread starter Thread starter danago
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prove that points A, B, and C are collinear, the direction of vectors AB and AC must be shown to be proportional. The position vectors for A, B, and C are given as 3i-j, -i+15j, and 9i-25j, respectively. By calculating vectors BA and BC, it is determined that their components have a consistent ratio of 1:4, indicating parallelism. Since both vectors share point B, this confirms that points A, B, and C are collinear. Various methods, including the dot product and cross product, can also be utilized to demonstrate collinearity.
danago
Gold Member
Messages
1,118
Reaction score
4
I merged the duplicate thread. This post cannot be deleted!


Integral
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
If A, B and C all lie on the same line, then what can you say about the direction of the lines, AB,AC ?
 
Hey. Heres the question:

Points A, B and C have position vectors 3i-j, -i+15j and 9i-25j respectively. Use vectors to prove that A, B and C are collinear.

Ive drawn a diagram:
http://img2.freeimagehosting.net/uploads/b74251caf2.gif

a=3i-j
b=-i+15j
c=9i-25j

So pretty much, i think i need to prove that \overrightarrow{BA}=h\overrightarrow{BC}

Ive found that
\overrightarrow{BA}=\overrightarrow{BO}+\overrightarrow{OA}
=-b+a
=4i-16j

\overrightarrow{BC}=\overrightarrow{BO}+\overrightarrow{OC}
=-b+c
=10i-40j

From that, i can see that the i and j components have a set ratio. ie. i:j = 1:4.

For this question, what would i write as my final proof that the three points are collinear? I would use the answers page in my textbook, but it doesn't give answers to questions that are more than 1 line :devil:

Thanks in advance,
Dan.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
You solution is correct up to the same ratio bit.
Thereafter, sinmply say that, because of the same ratio,
|BC| is a multiple of |AB|
hence BC and AB are parallel.
Since they share a common point, B, then they are collinear.


BTW, your sketch looks like it has OA at (3i + j) rather than (3i - j)
 
ok thanks very much for that.

And yea, i made a mistake in my sketch.
 
Hmm...
Is there an example in the text somewhere?
Since 'use vectors to' is pretty vauge, you can do this a bunch of ways.

For example, you could use the dot product
\frac{(\vec{b}-\vec{c}) \cdot (\vec{a}-\vec{b})}{| (\vec{b}-\vec{c})| |(\vec{a}-\vec{b})|}=\pm 1
or the cross product
(\vec{b}-\vec{c}) \times (\vec{a}-\vec{b}) = \vec{0}

Or you could show that all the vectors are on the line
y=-4x+11

Or your drawing works
 
Last edited:
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top