Proving a perfect square with factorials

  • Thread starter Thread starter Coldie
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Factorials Square
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that nC2 + (n-1)C2 is a perfect square for positive integers n greater than 1. Participants express confusion over the factorial expressions and how to simplify them effectively. There is a suggestion to expand the factorials to facilitate cancellation, and a recommendation to add the fractions before simplifying. The conversation highlights the need for clarity in mathematical notation and problem-solving steps. Overall, the thread emphasizes collaboration in tackling the proof involving factorials.
Coldie
Messages
84
Reaction score
0
The tex seems to be showing different problems than the ones I'm typing... maybe it's just me, but if what I'm talking about doesn't seem to make any sense, please quote my message to see what I've actually typed in the tex tags.

If n is a positive integer and n > 1, prove that nC2 + (n-1)C2 is a perfect square.

Now, expanded, this is what they look like...

\frac{n!}{2!(n-2)!} + \frac{(n-1)!}{2!(n-3)!}

I'm not sure whether to multiply by the denominators or whether I'm simply supposed to try to simplify each one on its own, or a combination of the two. Moreover, I'm certain I'll still have at least one factorial left when I'm through, and how can I prove that any function with a factorial in it is a perfect square? Could someone give me a nudge in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You should be able to pull a few terms out of the top so that you can cancel the factorial on the bottom.
 
Do you mean expanding the n! on the top with both functions until the (n-2)! on the left one and the (n-3)! on the right one cancel out the one at the top?
 
That should work, but I think it's a little easier if you add the fractions first. I'm sorry, I should have been clearer. I was assuming you were stuck at the step you mentioned where you had one term with factorials in it, and I was going from there.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top