Proving a Sequence Doesn't Repeat: What's the Best Method?

  • Thread starter Thread starter StephenPrivitera
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sequences
StephenPrivitera
Messages
360
Reaction score
0
Is there some concise mathematical form to express the fact that a sequence repeats with period t beginning with the nth term? For example, the sequence {1,2,6,3,7,3,1,7,3,1,7,3,1,7,3,1,...} repeats with period 3 beginning with the 5th term. Can we say, for all n>4, if b=an then b=an+3?
I need to prove that a certain sequence doesn't repeat. How is this commonly done?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
this may work. I'm assuming that the sequence is given by some formula an=f(n). well, if that function is one-to-one, then it won't repeat. if you can prove that f(m)=f(n)-->m=n that would do it. if f is something defined on real numbers and its derivative is never zero, it's one-to-one. that won't exactly help if f has factorials unless you want to get into gamma-land.
 
A typical way to state eventual periodicity as:

<br /> \forall n \geq N, a_n = a_{n+e}<br />
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Back
Top