Proving A4 Has No Subgroup of Order 6

  • Thread starter Thread starter SqrachMasda
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subgroup
SqrachMasda
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
Prove that A4 has no subgroup of order 6 in this way (and this way only):

Suppose that A4 has a subgroup H of order 6. Explain (in one sentence) why H must contain a 3-cycle. WLOG(without loss of generality) let this be (1,2,3).
Then H must have iota,(1,2,3) and (1,2,3)^-1=(3,2,1).
Now apply the result from my permutation 2 thread( Prove: a group of even order must have an even number of elements of order 2) to H.
As a result all that's left to do is take three cases, according to which element of order 2 in A4 belongs to H.
In each case compute products and take inverses in H to show H always has more than 6 elements (contradiction)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
SqrachMasda said:
Prove that A4 has no subgroup of order 6 in this way (and this way only):

Suppose that A4 has a subgroup H of order 6. Explain (in one sentence) why H must contain a 3-cycle.
By the first Sylow theorem, there is a subgroup of ##H## of order ##3## since ##|H|=6=3 \cdot 2##, i.e. a cyclic group ##\langle g \,|\,g^3=1 \rangle## which makes ##g## a ##3-##cycle.
WLOG(without loss of generality) let this be (1,2,3).
Then H must have iota,(1,2,3) and (1,2,3)^-1=(3,2,1).
... since you we the consecutive application of permutations from left to right.
Now apply the result from my permutation 2 thread( Prove: a group of even order must have an even number of elements of order 2) to H.
This contradicts the third Sylow theorem and is wrong. E.g. ##S_3=\langle (1), (123), (321),(12),(13),(23) \rangle## has three elements of order ##2## and three is odd, and ##|S_3|=6##.

Maybe you meant: ... of order ##3##. Every element ##g## of order ##3## pairs with a different element ##g^{-1}## also of order ##3##, and no pair contains an element of another pair.
As a result all that's left to do is take three cases, according to which element of order 2 in A4 belongs to H.
In each case compute products and take inverses in H to show H always has more than 6 elements (contradiction)
Again order ##3## I suppose.
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Back
Top