Proving (A_{ik}B_{kj})_{mm} = (A_{ki}B_{jk})_{mm}: Index Notation Question

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the expression ##(A_{ik}B_{kj})_{mm} = (A_{ki}B_{jk})_{mm}## in index notation, focusing on the properties of matrix multiplication and the implications of symmetry and anti-symmetry in the context of traces of matrices. Participants explore the notation and the conditions under which the equality holds.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express uncertainty about whether the right side of the equation leads to a different outcome, questioning the assumption of symmetry.
  • Others mention that the equality holds for the anti-symmetric part, noting that sign changes cancel out.
  • There is a discussion about decomposing matrices into symmetric and anti-symmetric parts, with references to the properties of these components.
  • One participant clarifies the notation, suggesting that the expression represents the trace of the product of matrices, indicating that both sides are indeed traces of the same product.
  • Another participant agrees that the right-hand side can be interpreted as the trace of the product in a different order, asserting that traces of products are equal regardless of the order.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally express uncertainty about the symmetry assumption, and while some agree on the properties of traces, there is no consensus on the implications of the anti-symmetric part or the conditions under which the original equality holds.

Contextual Notes

There are unresolved questions regarding the notation used and the assumptions about the matrices A and B, particularly concerning their symmetric and anti-symmetric components.

hellomrrobot
Messages
10
Reaction score
0
I am having trouble showing that ##(A_{ik}B_{kj})_{mm} = (A_{ki}B_{jk})_{mm}## Wouldn't the right side end up having a different outcome? Or can we assume its symmetric?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hellomrrobot said:
I am having trouble showing that ##(A_{ik}B_{kj})_{mm} = (A_{ki}B_{jk})_{mm}##Wouldn't the right side end up having a different outcome? Or can we assume its symmetric?
It is true for the anti-symmetric part also because the sign change cancels.
 
Mentz114 said:
It is true for the anti-symmetric part also because the sign change cancels.

anti-symmetric?
 
hellomrrobot said:
anti-symmetric?
Yes, I think so. A and B can be decomposed into symmetric and anti-symmetric parts.
For the antisymmetric part
##A_{ik}B_{kj}=(-A_{ki})(-B_{jk})##

[Edit]

Is there a 'raised' index here ?

##{A_i}^k B_{kj}##
 
hellomrrobot said:
I am having trouble showing that ##(A_{ik}B_{kj})_{mm} = (A_{ki}B_{jk})_{mm}##Wouldn't the right side end up having a different outcome? Or can we assume its symmetric?
It would help if you would explain your notation.

I suppose that you are using Einstein summation convention. And that when you write (A_{ik}B_{kj}) you mean, the matrix whose i,j element is sum_k (A_{ik}B_{kj}). In other words, the ij element of the matrix AB. Now you want to sum over m the m,m elements of that matrix, so you are talking about trace(AB).

Similarly on the right hand side, replace i and j both by m and m, sum over m and sum over k, and you see that what you have written is just trace(AB).
 
gill1109 said:
It would help if you would explain your notation.

I suppose that you are using Einstein summation convention. And that when you write (A_{ik}B_{kj}) you mean, the matrix whose i,j element is sum_k (A_{ik}B_{kj}). In other words, the ij element of the matrix AB. Now you want to sum over m the m,m elements of that matrix, so you are talking about trace(AB).

Similarly on the right hand side, replace i and j both by m and m, sum over m and sum over k, and you see that what you have written is just trace(AB).

Well, I would say that the right hand side is trace(BA), but that is always equal to trace(AB).
 
stevendaryl said:
Well, I would say that the right hand side is trace(BA), but that is always equal to trace(AB).
Thank you! You are right.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
12K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
14K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
7K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K