Proving absolute converge with minorant criterion

  • Thread starter Thread starter JulienB
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Absolute
JulienB
Messages
408
Reaction score
12

Homework Statement



Hi everybody! I'm stuck on a problem in which I don't manage to prove absolute convergence (or not) of the series ∑ (-1)j/(√j + √(j+1)).

Homework Equations



Leibniz criterion, minorant criterion, limit comparison test, maybe others

The Attempt at a Solution



So first I noticed that the series alternates, so I ran the Leibniz test in order to find out if the series converges/diverges:

|an+1| - |an| = 1/(√(j+1) + √(j+2)) - 1/(√j + √(j+1))
= (√j - √(j+2))/[(√(j+1) + √(j+2))⋅(√j + √(j+1))] < 0
⇒ the sequence is monotone decreasing.

lim j→∞ (1/(√j + √(j+1))) = 0
⇒ the series converges.

Now that was rather easy, but I know that in order to prove that the series absolutely converges or not I must find out if the sequence |an| converges or diverges.

And that's my problem. I imagine it being divergent, but I cannot seem to find a known divergent series smaller than 1/(√j + √(j+1)) (which btw can be rewritten as (√(j+1) - √j)). Any hint?

Maybe I'm just using the wrong criterion. I just tried the limit comparison test, which didn't work, but that might be because I never used it (somehow we don't have this criterion in our class though it seems very important!). Any advices about that test? How do you choose your "other series" to run the test with?Thank you very much in advance for your answers.Julien.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Actually I just got an idea: if I factor the √j out, I get:

√(j+1) - √j = √j (√(1+(1/j)) - 1)

which is bigger than √j for all j ≥ 1. √j diverges, therefore √(j+1) - √j diverges too so the original series converges but not absolutely.

Does that make sense? Any advices about the strategies to use for majorant/minorant criterions?

EDIT: Oh no that was wrong... It's actually smaller than √j! :(
 
JulienB said:
Actually I just got an idea: if I factor the √j out, I get:

√(j+1) - √j = √j (√(1+(1/j)) - 1)

which is bigger than √j for all j ≥ 1. √j diverges, therefore √(j+1) - √j diverges too so the original series converges but not absolutely.

Does that make sense? Any advices about the strategies to use for majorant/minorant criterions?

EDIT: Oh no that was wrong... It's actually smaller than √j! :(

After your first step, what about looking at partial sums?
 
JulienB said:

Homework Statement



Hi everybody! I'm stuck on a problem in which I don't manage to prove absolute convergence (or not) of the series ∑ (-1)j/(√j + √(j+1)).

Homework Equations



Leibniz criterion, minorant criterion, limit comparison test, maybe others

The Attempt at a Solution



So first I noticed that the series alternates, so I ran the Leibniz test in order to find out if the series converges/diverges:

|an+1| - |an| = 1/(√(j+1) + √(j+2)) - 1/(√j + √(j+1))
= (√j - √(j+2))/[(√(j+1) + √(j+2))⋅(√j + √(j+1))] < 0
⇒ the sequence is monotone decreasing.

lim j→∞ (1/(√j + √(j+1))) = 0
⇒ the series converges.

Now that was rather easy, but I know that in order to prove that the series absolutely converges or not I must find out if the sequence |an| converges or diverges.

And that's my problem. I imagine it being divergent, but I cannot seem to find a known divergent series smaller than 1/(√j + √(j+1)) (which btw can be rewritten as (√(j+1) - √j)). Any hint?

Maybe I'm just using the wrong criterion. I just tried the limit comparison test, which didn't work, but that might be because I never used it (somehow we don't have this criterion in our class though it seems very important!). Any advices about that test? How do you choose your "other series" to run the test with?Thank you very much in advance for your answers.

Julien.

1. You can do the sum ##S_n = \sum_{i=1}^n [\sqrt{i+1} - \sqrt{i}\:]## explicitly, to obtain a very simple formula for ##S_n## in terms of ##n##.
2. You can, instead, use the fact that ##1/[\sqrt{i+1}+\sqrt{i}] > 2/\sqrt{i+1}##, then use the fact that the "p-series" ##\sum 1/n^p## converges if and only if ##p > 1##. This last fact has been discussed many times in this Forum. Alternatively, you can use the fact that ##1/\sqrt{i+1} > 1/(i+1)## and then use the fact that the harmonic series ##1/n## is divergent.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top