MHB Proving $\angle ABC$ is Acute: Inside the Triangle $ABC$

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxkor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
maxkor
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Inside the triangle $ABC$ is point $P$, such that $BP > AP$ and $BP > CP$. Prove that $\angle ABC$ is acute.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
triineq.png

We are given that $x>y$ and $w>v$ therefore $x+w > y+v = \angle ABC$

Now $\angle CAB > x$ and $\angle ACB >w$ so $\angle CAB + \angle ACB > x+w > y+v = \angle ABC$

But $\angle CAB + \angle ACB = 180 - \angle ABC$ so $180 - \angle ABC > \angle ABC$ and $\angle ABC < 90$
 
I don't get it. Why doesn't the triangle below fit the ciiteria?

-Dan
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (1).png
    Screenshot (1).png
    11.1 KB · Views: 134
@topsquark
Why doesn't the triangle fit the criteria?
This triangle fits the criteria.
 
maxkor said:
@topsquark
Why doesn't the triangle fit the criteria?
This triangle fits the criteria.
Aaahh! I was reading the problem wrong. I thought it was asking to show that the triangle ABC was acute. My bad.

-Dan
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
989
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top