MHB Proving $\angle ABC$ is Acute: Inside the Triangle $ABC$

  • Thread starter Thread starter maxkor
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
AI Thread Summary
Inside triangle ABC, point P is defined such that BP is greater than both AP and CP, leading to the conclusion that angle ABC is acute. The relationships x > y and w > v imply that x + w exceeds y + v, establishing that angle ABC must be less than 90 degrees. The sum of angles CAB and ACB is greater than angle ABC, reinforcing that angle ABC is acute. A misunderstanding arose regarding the problem's requirements, with initial confusion about whether the triangle itself was acute. Ultimately, the proof confirms that angle ABC is indeed acute based on the given conditions.
maxkor
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Inside the triangle $ABC$ is point $P$, such that $BP > AP$ and $BP > CP$. Prove that $\angle ABC$ is acute.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
triineq.png

We are given that $x>y$ and $w>v$ therefore $x+w > y+v = \angle ABC$

Now $\angle CAB > x$ and $\angle ACB >w$ so $\angle CAB + \angle ACB > x+w > y+v = \angle ABC$

But $\angle CAB + \angle ACB = 180 - \angle ABC$ so $180 - \angle ABC > \angle ABC$ and $\angle ABC < 90$
 
I don't get it. Why doesn't the triangle below fit the ciiteria?

-Dan
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot (1).png
    Screenshot (1).png
    11.1 KB · Views: 142
@topsquark
Why doesn't the triangle fit the criteria?
This triangle fits the criteria.
 
maxkor said:
@topsquark
Why doesn't the triangle fit the criteria?
This triangle fits the criteria.
Aaahh! I was reading the problem wrong. I thought it was asking to show that the triangle ABC was acute. My bad.

-Dan
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top