Proving Complex Number Equality

Werg22
Messages
1,431
Reaction score
1
How to proove that

(x - a)(x - b)(x - c)...

If a, b, c... are complex numbers, and none is conjugent to another the result will always be complex? Complex as is not real for those who like to complicate things...
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Werg22 said:
How to proove that

(x - a)(x - b)(x - c)...

If a, b, c... are complex numbers, and none is conjugent to another the result will always be complex? Complex as is not real for those who like to complicate things...

well, to start off, the first thing you need to do is to start it on your own.
 
Well, if the equation's coefficients are not complex, but x+iY is a root, then x-iY is also a root, since we collect imaginary parts separate from real.
 
well what do you get when you multiple one C:P(x) to a R:P(x)
 
Well this the only thing i could proove; with two factors;

(x - (a + bi))(x - (c + di))
x^2 - x(a + bi + c+di) + (c+di)(a+bi)
x?2 -x(a+c + i(b+d)) + (ca -bd + i(da + cb))

In order for the result to be real;

b = -d
-da = cb

ba=cb

a=c

so it is actually

(x - (a + bi))(x - (a -bi)), otherwise the result is not real. But how to proove that it is also applicable for any amount of factors?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

3
Replies
108
Views
10K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top