Proving Conjectures About the Binet Formula for Q(\sqrt{k})

  • Thread starter Thread starter dodo
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjecture
dodo
Messages
695
Reaction score
2
Let Q(\sqrt{k}), for some positive integer k, be the extension of the field of rationals with basis (1, \sqrt{k}). For example, in Q(\sqrt{5}) the element ({1 \over 2}, {1 \over 2}) is the golden ratio = {1 \over 2} + {1 \over 2}\sqrt{5}.

Given an extension Q(\sqrt{k}), let B(n) denote the 'Binet formula',
B(n) = {{p^n - (1-p)^n} \over \sqrt k}, n = 0, 1, 2, ...​
where p = ({1 \over 2}, {1 \over 2}).

Conj. 1: B(n) produces only integers, iif k \equiv 1 \ ("mod" \ 4).

Conj. 2: When k \equiv 1 \ ("mod" \ 4), B(n) is the closed-form formula for the recurrence sequence
x_n = x_{n-1} + A \; x_{n-2}, n = 2, 3, 4, ...​
x_0 = 0, \ \ x_1 = 1​
with A = {{k - 1} \over 4}.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Isn't the second conjecture a straightforward exercise? And you don't even have to bother solving the ordinary linear difference equation: you already know the (putative) solution! (Why do you have the congruence condition on k for conjecture 2?)

And isn't conjecture 1 a trivial consequence of conjecture 2?


I suppose one thing might help to see conjecture 2: if it's right, then p^n and (1-p)^n would be a basis for the solution space to the unconstrained version of your difference equation.
 
I'm not sure I follow. (And in any case it's not trivial to me.) :D

As I see it, the first conjecture is a necessary previous step, for the second to be applicable. Possibly because I was interested in recurrence sequences returning only integers and with A = 1, 2, 3, ..., and frankly did not pay attention to the fact that B(n) could in fact be also the closed form for rational values of A and rational-producing sequences.

I'll try to digest what you're saying.
 
There is a generalised Binet formula for the recurrence relation G(n) = aG(n-1) + bG(n-2), which explains much more than the problem raised.
The system does not allow me to post URLs to other sites as I have made less than 15 posts(why ?), but googling "generalised fibonacci" helps, and I also give a "traditional" reference:
Vella, A. and Vella, D. (2006) Calculating exact cycle lengths in the generalised Fibonacci sequence modulo p. Math. Gaz. 90 (available on the internet).
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top