Proving Continuity of g(x) on a Metric Space T with f(x)=x

  • Thread starter Thread starter l888l888l888
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Continuity Metric
l888l888l888
Messages
49
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



T is a compact metric space with metric d. f:T->T is continuous and for every x in T f(x)=x. Need to show g:T->R is continous, g(x)=d(f(x),x).

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


f is continuous for all a in T if given any epsilon>0 there is a delta>0 st d(x,a)<delta implies d(f(x),f(a))<epsilon. Need to show there is a delta st d(x,a)< delta implies |g(x)-g(a)|<epsilon.
by a previous problem i did... |g(x)-g(a)|=|d(f(x),x)-d(f(a),a)|<= d(f(x),f(a))+d(x,a)<d(f(x),f(a)) + delta. This is where I got stuck. from the assumption that f is continuous we got from there that d(f(x),f(a))<epsilon. but if i say that then i would have...|g(x)-g(a)|<epsilon + delta and inorder for |g(x)-g(a)|to be <epsilon we would have to choose delta to be 0 which it can't be because it has to be greater than 0. any suggestions on what i should do?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi l888l888l888! :smile:

l888l888l888 said:

Homework Statement



T is a compact metric space with metric d. f:T->T is continuous and for every x in T f(x)=x. Need to show g:T->R is continous, g(x)=d(f(x),x).

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


f is continuous for all a in T if given any epsilon>0 there is a delta>0 st d(x,a)<delta implies d(f(x),f(a))<epsilon. Need to show there is a delta st d(x,a)< delta implies |g(x)-g(a)|<epsilon.

This must be true for every epsilon, so also for \varepsilon/2. So, what happens to the following if you take

|g(x)-g(a)|&lt;\varepsilon/2

by a previous problem i did... |g(x)-g(a)|=|d(f(x),x)-d(f(a),a)|<= d(f(x),f(a))+d(x,a)<d(f(x),f(a)) + delta. This is where I got stuck. from the assumption that f is continuous we got from there that d(f(x),f(a))<epsilon. but if i say that then i would have...|g(x)-g(a)|<epsilon + delta and inorder for |g(x)-g(a)|to be <epsilon we would have to choose delta to be 0 which it can't be because it has to be greater than 0. any suggestions on what i should do?
 
hello micromass! I am not really understanding your question. can you clarify? did you mean d(f(x),f(a))<epsilon/2?
 
I'm so sorry! What was I thinking...

But yes, that is what I meant. You can take d(f(x),f(a))&lt;\varepsilon/2
 
Actually, I think I have it now. correct me if I am wrong...
f is continuous for all a in T if given any epsilon>0 there is a delta>0 st d(x,a)<delta implies d(f(x),f(a))<epsilon/2. Need to show there is a delta st d(x,a)< delta implies |g(x)-g(a)|<epsilon.
|g(x)-g(a)|=|d(f(x),x)-d(f(a),a)|<= d(f(x),f(a))+d(x,a)<epsilon/2 + delta. choose delta to be epsilon/2. so therefore |g(x)-g(a)|=|d(f(x),x)-d(f(a),a)|<= d(f(x),f(a))+d(x,a)<epsilon/2 + epsilon/2=epsilon, as desired...
 
Seems good! :smile:
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top