Proving Convergence of the Sum for Real Parameter a in (-1,1)"

  • Thread starter Thread starter twoflower
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Approach
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the convergence of the series ∑(a^n)/(1+a^n) for real parameter a in the interval (-1, 1). The initial approach involved applying d'Alembert's criterion, leading to the conclusion that the limit of the ratio of consecutive terms approaches zero, indicating convergence. However, a participant pointed out an error in calculating a limit, clarifying that the expression approaches 'a' instead of zero. Despite this mistake, it was confirmed that convergence is still achieved for values of a less than 1. The conversation emphasizes the importance of correctly applying convergence tests in series analysis.
twoflower
Messages
363
Reaction score
0
Hi all,

my task is to solve the convergence of the sum in dependence to the parameter a real.

<br /> \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \frac{a^{n}}{1+a^{n}}<br />

I did it this way:

First I found out that if the sum converges, a will have to be in interval (-1, 1). So how to prove that for these values of parameter the sum converges?

Let's try d'Alembert's criterion, which tells us this:

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}} &lt; 1 \Rightarrow \sum a_{n}{} is convergent<br />

So:

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{a^{n+1}}{1+a^{n+1}} : \frac{a^{n}}{1+a^{n}} = <br />

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {a^{n+1}.(1+a^{n})}{a^{n}.(1+a^{n+1})} = <br />

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {a.(1+a^{n})}{1+a.a^{n}} = <br />

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {a}{a^{n+1} + 1} + \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac{a^{n+1}}{a^{n+1} + 1}<br />

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {a}{a^{n+1} + 1} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac { \frac{a}{a}}{a^{n} + \frac{1}{a}} = \frac{1}{0 + \frac{1}{a}} = 0<br />

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {a^{n+1}}{a^{n+1} + 1} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {1}{1 + \frac{1}{a^{n+1}}} = 0<br />

Thus

<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {a^{n+1}}{a^{n+1} + 1} : \frac{a^{n}}{1+a^{n}} = 0 + 0 = 0<br />

This way I proved the convergence for a in (-1, 1)

Is it ok?

Thank you for your comments.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
twoflower said:
<br /> \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac {a}{a^{n+1} + 1} = \lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \frac { \frac{a}{a}}{a^{n} + \frac{1}{a}} = \frac{1}{0 + \frac{1}{a}} = 0<br />
That limit is incorrect, the expression goes to "a", not to 0.
However, since a<1, convergence is achieved.
 
arildno said:
That limit is incorrect, the expression goes to "a", not to 0.
However, since a<1, convergence is achieved.

You're right, I didn't take into account that a is constant.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
Back
Top