Proving Diagonal Bisection of Rhombus

  • Thread starter Thread starter powp
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the diagonals of a rhombus bisect each other and are perpendicular. It highlights that a rhombus is a special case of a parallelogram, where all sides are equal, and thus the properties of parallelograms apply. The proof involves using vectors to show that the diagonals can be expressed in terms of vector equations, leading to simultaneous equations that confirm the bisection. The conclusion is that the diagonals not only bisect each other but also intersect at right angles. This geometric relationship is essential for understanding the properties of rhombuses.
powp
Messages
91
Reaction score
0
Hello

How do you prove that the diagonals od a rhombus bisect each other??

Thanks
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
when u prove that they make right angles between them.
then, you will get the answer.
180/2 = 90!
 
What I can figure out is that all sides are equal and the oposite corners angles = each other. Not sure what to do
 
it is the theory which tells you that in a rombus the diagonals are perpendicular
so far they bisect each other
is it clear?
 
You can actually prove a stronger result easily using vectors. The diagonals of a parallelogram bisect one another. The rhombus is just a special case of a parallelogram with all sides being equal.

Let the parallelogram be drawn on a Cartesian plane as shown in the diagram, and the sides labelled as vectors as shown. You can see that one diagonal is \vec a + \vec b and the other is \vec b - \vec a

Let \vec{WO} be k_1(\vec a + \vec b)

and

\vec{OZ} be k_2(\vec b - \vec a)

where k_1, k_2 are some scalars (which we are to determine).

In triangle WOZ, you can further see that

\vec{WZ} = \vec{WO} + \vec{OZ}

hence

\vec b = k_1(\vec a + \vec b) + k_2(\vec b - \vec a)

\vec b = (k_1 - k_2)\vec a + (k_1 + k_2)\vec b

giving k_1 - k_2 = 0 ---eqn (1)

and k_1 + k_2 = 1 ---eqn(2)

Solving those simple simultaneous equations yields k_1 = k_2 = \frac{1}{2}

so you know that the diagonals bisect each other. (QED)
 

Attachments

  • parall.jpg
    parall.jpg
    4.7 KB · Views: 549
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top