Proving/Disproving Series Transformation Properties

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the properties of series transformations, specifically examining the conditions under which two series, \(\sum a_n\) and \(\sum b_n\), can be related through rearrangement and convergence. It is established that if \(\sum |b_n|\) converges, then \(\sum b_n\) is absolutely convergent, leading to the conclusion that \(\sum a_n\) must equal \(\sum b_n\). This directly contradicts the second condition, \(\sum b_n = 2 + \sum a_n\), thus proving that such series cannot exist under the given constraints.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of series convergence, particularly absolute convergence
  • Familiarity with rearrangement of series
  • Knowledge of mathematical notation for series and summation
  • Basic principles of real analysis
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of absolutely convergent series in real analysis
  • Explore the Riemann series theorem and its implications on series rearrangement
  • Investigate examples of series that demonstrate convergence and divergence
  • Learn about the implications of series transformations in functional analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of real analysis, and anyone interested in the properties of series and convergence in mathematical theory.

daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove or disprove:
There exist series [tex]\sum a_n[/tex] and [tex]\sum b_n[/tex] so that:
1) you can get [tex]b_n[/tex] by rearranging the elements of [tex]a_n[/tex]
2) [tex]\sum b_n = 2 + \sum a_n[/tex]
3) [tex]\sum |b_n| = 2 \sum a_n[/tex]
(all the series converge to finate values)

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


From (1) I know that [tex]\sum |b_n| = \sum |a_n|[/tex] but I can't see how can to continue from here, can someone point me in the right direction?
Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You can't say that all series mentioned converge, because if [tex]\sum |b_n|[/tex] converges then the series is absolutely convergent which means that any reordering of the original series [tex]\sum b_n[/tex] converges to the same value, which implies that [tex]\sum a_n = \sum b_n[/tex] by virtue of (1). That means that (1) contradicts (2). So I have to say that it's impossible. But I could be wrong.
 
DavidWhitbeck said:
You can't say that all series mentioned converge, because if [tex]\sum |b_n|[/tex] converges then the series is absolutely convergent which means that any reordering of the original series [tex]\sum b_n[/tex] converges to the same value, which implies that [tex]\sum a_n = \sum b_n[/tex] by virtue of (1).
How do you know that rearranging the elements in an absolutly converging series doesn't change their value?

EDIT: Oh, it's easy to see that that's true if you split up each of the series into positive and negative "sub-series".

Thanks for your help.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K