Proving Equivalence of y is Rational, y/3 is Rational, 2y+5 is Rational

  • Thread starter Thread starter PowerStrike
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Equivalence
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equivalence of three statements regarding rational numbers: y is rational, y/3 is rational, and 2y+5 is rational. The initial approach involves expressing y as a fraction of integers, leading to the conclusion that y/3 and 2y+5 can also be expressed as fractions with integer numerators and denominators, thus proving their rationality. There is confusion about the necessity of the numerator being non-zero, with clarification that only the denominator must be non-zero for a number to be rational. The participants agree that if y can be expressed as p/q, then all derived forms remain rational. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the definitions and properties of rational numbers.
PowerStrike
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Well I have to prove the following statements are equivalent:
a. y is a rational number
b. y/3 is a rational number
c. 2y+5 is a rational number
So a -> b -> c -> a

I'm not quite sure how you are suppose to prove something is rational however.
I started like this:

* y = q/r Where q & r are integers, r is not 0, no common factors other than 1 [Therefore rational]

* y/3
q/r/3 ... (q/r)(1/3)= q/3r ... Which is rational because everything is integer math?

* 2y+5 ... 2(q/r) + (5/1) ... same reason

This doesn't seem to work like the ones I've done before with proving something is even (2n) or odd (2n+1). Is there some step I'm not getting?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see why they can't have common factors (other than 1), 8/6 is a rational number too. I think it's sufficient that it can be written as p/q where q is non-zero and p and q are integers. It should be too hard then, it actually seems trivial.

If y = p/q (with p and q as above), then y/3 is p/(3q) and 3q is still an integer since integer*integer is another integer, hence y/3 is rational too. Etcetera, I assume.
 
For 2y+5 you should condense it into a single fraction with nonzero integer numerator and denominator.
 
0rthodontist said:
For 2y+5 you should condense it into a single fraction with nonzero integer numerator and denominator.
Why can't a fraction with a numerator of 0 be a rational number. As long as the denominator is not 0, we have y = 0 / r = 0 (a rational number).
Yes, I agree with the nonzero integer denominator part, but not numerator!
Am I missing something? :confused:
 
Oh yeah, right. I meant denominator. I kind of added the nonzero part at the end without thinking.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top