MHB Proving F=-constant*(delta y) for delta y < d

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mango12
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Delta
Mango12
Messages
48
Reaction score
0
View attachment 5404

I need to prove that F=-constant*(delta y) if delta y < d

I have no idea how to go about this. Please help!
 

Attachments

  • Untitled.png
    Untitled.png
    6.7 KB · Views: 96
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Mango12 said:
I need to prove that F=-constant*(delta y) if delta y < d

I have no idea how to go about this. Please help!
Look at one of the white balls. There are three forces acting on it: 1) the weight, 2) the tension, and last but not least, 3) the electric force. If the system is stable then the sum of these forces is 0 N.

Can you finish from there or do you need more detail?

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
Look at one of the white balls. There are three forces acting on it: 1) the weight, 2) the tension, and last but not least, 3) the electric force. If the system is stable then the sum of these forces is 0 N.

Can you finish from there or do you need more detail?

-Dan

well I think weight is mgsin(theta) and tension is Fesin(theta) + mgcos(theta)

But I don't know theta and I don't get what delta y has to do with it
 
Mango12 said:
well I think weight is mgsin(theta) and tension is Fesin(theta) + mgcos(theta)

But I don't know theta and I don't get what delta y has to do with it
I didn't notice this last night...What force are you trying to find?

Either way you are likely to have to consider at least some of the following...

Consider the charge on the right. The electric force between two point charges is [math]F = \frac{k q^2}{d^2}[/math]. The weight of the ball is mg, and you have a tension force,T, acting up and to the left at an angle [math]\theta[/math]. Using the usual xy coordinate system we have Newton's 2nd:
[math]\sum F_x = -T~cos( \theta ) + \frac{kq^2}{d^2} = 0 [/math]

[math]\sum F_y = T~sin( \theta ) - mg = 0[/math]

Use the y equation to get an equation for T. Put that T value into the x equation. That will get you an equation for d in terms of [math]\theta[/math]. Beyond that I don't know what force you are trying to calculate.

-Dan
 
topsquark said:
I didn't notice this last night...What force are you trying to find?

Either way you are likely to have to consider at least some of the following...

Consider the charge on the right. The electric force between two point charges is [math]F = \frac{k q^2}{d^2}[/math]. The weight of the ball is mg, and you have a tension force,T, acting up and to the left at an angle [math]\theta[/math]. Using the usual xy coordinate system we have Newton's 2nd:
[math]\sum F_x = -T~cos( \theta ) + \frac{kq^2}{d^2} = 0 [/math]

[math]\sum F_y = T~sin( \theta ) - mg = 0[/math]

Use the y equation to get an equation for T. Put that T value into the x equation. That will get you an equation for d in terms of [math]\theta[/math]. Beyond that I don't know what force you are trying to calculate.

-Dan

I'm not sure. I do know I need to show that the negative charge would bounce up and down as if on a spring.
 
Mango12 said:
I'm not sure. I do know I need to show that the negative charge would bounce up and down as if on a spring.
Show that F = -constant * delta y

This is what I have so far that we did in class. He said we needed to make a substitution somewhere but I don’t understand where

2F=[Kq^2/r^2]2

Fy = [2Kq^2/r^2] sin theta

Sin theta = delta y/r
Sin theta = delta y/(d/2)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
10
Views
932
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top