Proving F is not an increasing function?

mdlavey
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
1. (Initial Question) let f be a function from R to R. Without using words of negation, write the meaning of "f is not an increasing function."



2. No Relevant Equations.



3.(Attempt at Solution) Does this mean that I just need to rewrite the statement without using the word "not", or am I somehow supposed to prove that f is not an increasing function? If I am supposed to prove this, how would I go about that?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
mdlavey said:
1. (Initial Question) let f be a function from R to R. Without using words of negation, write the meaning of "f is not an increasing function."



2. No Relevant Equations.



3.(Attempt at Solution) Does this mean that I just need to rewrite the statement without using the word "not", or am I somehow supposed to prove that f is not an increasing function? If I am supposed to prove this, how would I go about that?

Thanks!


Neither. You just need to fill in the blank spot in this:

If f is a function from R to R such that ____________________________, then f is not an increasing function on R.

You have a definition of increasing function to use to help you fill in the blank.
 
There exist some x and y such that x< y but ... What will be true of f(x) and f(y) to show that f is NOT increasing?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top