Proving G cannot Equal HK When K Contains a Conjugate of H

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter SiddharthM
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that if G is a finite group and K contains a conjugate of H, then G cannot equal the product HK. The user provides a special case where the product of a proper subgroup and its conjugate cannot equal the group unless the subgroup is the entire group. The proof involves expressing an element c as a product of elements from H and K, leading to the conclusion that if G=HK, then K cannot remain a proper subgroup of G.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of finite group theory
  • Familiarity with subgroup properties and conjugates
  • Knowledge of group product notation
  • Basic proof techniques in abstract algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of conjugate subgroups in group theory
  • Explore the implications of the product of subgroups in finite groups
  • Learn about the normalizer of a subgroup and its significance
  • Investigate the concept of group actions and their relation to conjugacy
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in group theory, as well as students studying abstract algebra who seek to deepen their understanding of subgroup interactions and properties.

SiddharthM
Messages
176
Reaction score
0
I've been trying to prove something that seems obvious but have had no success thus far:

say G is a finite group and H and K are proper subgroups, if K contains a conjugate of H, then it isn't possible to have G=HK.

Proof anybody? I'm happy if one can prove the special case below:

It's fairly easy to show one can't have the product of a proper subgroup and it's conjugate equal to a group i.e. it isn't possible that Hx^{-1}Hx=G unless H=G. Can you show it for an arbitrary product of conjugates? i.e. if \Pi_{x \in G} H^x=G then H=G. Note that H^x=x^{-1}Hx

thanks for the help
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Let c be an element such that cHc^{-1} \subseteq K.

Assume G=HK.

Express c^{-1} as a product c^{-1}=hk with h in H and k in K. Then
1 = chc^{-1}ck
(chc^{-1})^{-1}k^{-1} = c
both factors on the left hand side are in K so c is in K.

Since c is in K, H \subseteq c^{-1}Kc = K. We then have G=HK=K so K isn't a proper subgroup of G.
 
thanks for the prompt reply, i appreciate the help.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
673
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K