Proving "If f is Simultaneously an Eigenfunction of L^2 & L_z

  • Thread starter Thread starter Funzies
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Notation Spin
Funzies
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hello there,
I've got two short questions I was hoping you could help me with:

-I have to prove:
"if f is simulateneously an eigenfunction of L^2 and L_z, the square of the eigenvalue of L_z cannot exceed the eigenvalue of L^2"
He gives a hint that I should evaluate
<f|L^2|f>
But I don't have a clue what he means by this notation?!

-Why does this hold:
<S_x> = \chi^+S_x\chi
I am familiar with calculating <x> by doing:
&lt;x&gt;=\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\psi(x)^*x\psi(x)dx
But I do not understand this different situation. Could you tell me the underlying differences/similarities?

Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The "S_x" is one of the spin-operators. He has a trivial action in the Hilbert space of angular momentul states. So just forget about the spin, remember what you have to prove.

Another hint would be to connect the square of L_z and the L^2.
 
&lt;f|L^2|f&gt; is dirac notation and is more or less the same as \int_{-\inf}^{\inf}f(x)^*L^2f(x)dx so its essentially the expectation value &lt;L^2&gt; in this case. The difference is, dirac notation does not imply a particular representation for your state function f. When you write f(x), it is referred to as the coordinate representation, ie your state function is a function of position. You could also write your state function as a function of momentum, or whatever else.

In short, the &lt;f|L^2|f&gt; is a more general way to represent the integral you are used to.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
According to recent podcast between Jacob Barandes and Sean Carroll, Barandes claims that putting a sensitive qubit near one of the slits of a double slit interference experiment is sufficient to break the interference pattern. Here are his words from the official transcript: Is that true? Caveats I see: The qubit is a quantum object, so if the particle was in a superposition of up and down, the qubit can be in a superposition too. Measuring the qubit in an orthogonal direction might...
Back
Top