Proving If Two Integers Don't Divide by 3: A Number Theory Challenge

a.katerina
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,

i have just registered to the forum, because this time i study number theory and in some problems i can't figure out how to solve them.

This time i have to prove: If two integers x,y doesn't divided with 3 then the (x^2 - y^2) always is divided with 3.

Does anyone has a clue how to start?

Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Break it up into what x and y modulo 3 can be (so four cases)
 


what?? Can you explain it a little bit, please?
 


If x is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as x= 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k.
If y is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as y= 3j+1 or 3j+2 for some integer k.

That gives 4 cases to consider:
1) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+1.
2) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+2.
3) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+1.
4) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+2.

Calculate x^2- y^2 for each of those cases.
 


HallsofIvy said:
If x is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as x= 3k+1 or 3k+2 for some integer k.
If y is not divisible by 3 then it can be written as y= 3j+1 or 3j+2 for some integer k.

That gives 4 cases to consider:
1) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+1.
2) x= 3k+1 and y= 3j+2.
3) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+1.
4) x= 3k+2 and y= 3j+2.

Calculate x^2- y^2 for each of those cases.

Since +/- 0 = 0 are not cases 2 and 3 equivalent?

Since 2 = -1 and -1*-1 = 1 , (-1)^2 = (+1)^2 are not cases 1 and 4 equivalent?

Even better you can rewrite each term of an expression mod n before evaluating the expression mod n. Thus each of the terms can be rewriten mod 3 by substituting 0 for 3n and 1 for -1^2 (or 2^2) to get the equivalent expressions 1-1 = 0 mod 3 which is clearly correct.
 
Last edited:


Thank you very much for the help! I'm grateful to you!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top