Proving $\Im (\ln(-|x|))=\pi$ for All Reals

  • Thread starter Thread starter epkid08
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To prove that the imaginary part of ln(-|x|) equals π for all real x, one must recognize that negative real numbers can be expressed in polar form as re^(iπ). Direct calculation is problematic because it overlooks the multi-valued nature of the logarithm in the complex plane. By taking the logarithm, ln(r) + iπ emerges, confirming that the imaginary part consistently equals π. This approach highlights the importance of understanding complex logarithms and their properties. Thus, the proof effectively demonstrates that Im(ln(-|x|)) = π for all real x.
epkid08
Messages
264
Reaction score
1
How would someone go about proving:

\Im (ln(-|x|))=\pi for all reals, x, when the answer takes the form, a + bi.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
What's wrong with direct calculation?
 
epkid08 said:
How would someone go about proving:

\Im (ln(-|x|))=\pi for all reals, x, when the answer takes the form, a + bi.

Negative real numbers can be expressed in polar coordinates as re(pi)i. Take the log and you get ln(r)+(pi)i.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top