Proving Induction: n∑(1/√n) > 2(√(n+1) -1)

  • Thread starter Thread starter johann1301
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the inequality involving a summation and square roots using mathematical induction. The original statement is to show that the sum of the reciprocals of the square roots from 1 to n is greater than twice the difference of the square root of (n+1) and 1.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the induction process, questioning how to handle the transition from n=k to n=k+1. There are discussions about the correct interpretation of the summation limits and expressions involved.

Discussion Status

Several participants have provided hints and guidance on how to approach the inductive step, while others are clarifying the expressions involved. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of the inequalities and the necessary algebraic manipulations needed to progress.

Contextual Notes

Some participants express confusion regarding the requirement to use induction and the specific forms of the expressions involved. There are also mentions of potential misunderstandings about the implications of certain inequalities and the need for rigorous proof across all n.

johann1301
Messages
216
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Prove this by induction

n
∑(1/√n) > 2(√(n+1) -1)
i=1


The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried for several hours, with no real progress. When i assume that it works for n=k, and then try to prove for n=k+1 i get 2(√(k+2)-1)... i don't know how to partition this expression... can someone point me in the right direction...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
johann1301 said:

Homework Statement



Prove this by induction

n
∑(1/√n) > 2(√(n+1) -1)
i=1


The Attempt at a Solution



I have tried for several hours, with no real progress. When i assume that it works for n=k, and then try to prove for n=k+1 i get 2(√(k+2)-1)... i don't know how to partition this expression... can someone point me in the right direction...

Are you absolutely required to use induction? If not, there is a quick proof using elementary calculus (specifically, definite integration).
 
The task is part of the induction chapter in the textbook.
 
Are you sure that the left-hand side of the inequality is...

[itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac 1{\sqrt {n}}[/itex], rather than [itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac 1{\sqrt {k}}[/itex] ?
 
Mogarrr said:
Are you sure that the left-hand side of the inequality is...

[itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac 1{\sqrt {n}}[/itex], rather than [itex]\sum_{k=1}^{n} \frac 1{\sqrt {k}}[/itex] ?

woops!, i can correct it...
 
m
∑(1/√n) > 2(√(n+1) -1)
n=1
 
Again, the problem for me lies in that i can't partition(divide into a sum) the expression on the right...
 
johann1301 said:
m
∑(1/√n) > 2(√(n+1) -1)
n=1

Um, what is m?
 
So sorry, I'm not so good at the different placements for the different sum-limits/-startpoints. I first introduced "k" when i assumed that the inequality actually was valid, and then i set n=k+1 and tried to prove it...

This should be right;
n
∑(1/√i) > 2(√(n+1) -1)
i=1
 
  • #10
Mogarrr said:
Um, what is m?

forget m :)
 
  • #11
I think you meant to write...

[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} > \frac 2{\sqrt{m+1}} -1[/itex].

If this is the case, here's a way to start the inductive step:

[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m+1} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} = ( \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}}) + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}}[/itex]
 
  • #12
no, it is 2(√(n+1) -1) = 2√(n+1) -2
 
  • #13
Let me know if you'd like more hints, but I'm pretty sure you can finish the problem from here ;)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #14
johann1301 said:
no, it is 2(√(n+1) -1) = 2√(n+1) -2


Oh... the right hand side is a product. Oops.

That's ok. The steps in the proof won't change much.
 
  • #15
[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m+1} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} = ( \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}}) + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}}[/itex]
I already knew this, but how am i supposed to compare this result to the right side? the expression on the right side is impossible to write as a sum of any sort...? At least : 2√(m+2)...
 
  • #16
Starting from the Left-hand side of the inequality you wish to prove (P(m+1)),

[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m+1} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} = \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}}[/itex].

Recall that you assumed P(m) to be true, that is

[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} > 2 \cdot ((\sqrt{m+1}) -1)[/itex],

So recognizing this, you have...

[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m+1} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} = \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}} > 2 \cdot ((\sqrt{m+1}) -1) + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}}[/itex].
 
  • #17
If i contract the right side i get: (2m +3 -2√(m+1))/√(m+1)

Don't see how this is going to help.. :)
 
  • #18
dont i have to show that (2m +3 -2√(m+1))/√(m+1) can be written as 2(√(m+2) -1) to prove it...?

or maybe not since its an inequality...?
 
Last edited:
  • #19
johann1301 said:
dont i have to show that (2m +3 -2√(m+1))/√(m+1) can be written as 2(√(m+2) -1) to prove it...?

or maybe not since its an inequality...?

If you plug in some numbers you'll see...

[itex]2 \cdot (\sqrt{m+1} - 1) + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}} \neq 2 \cdot (\sqrt {(m+1)+1} - 1)[/itex].

You're next step should be to show that...

[itex]2 \cdot (\sqrt{m+1} - 1) + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}} > 2 \cdot (\sqrt {(m+1)+1} - 1)[/itex].
 
  • #20
johann1301 said:
[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m+1} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} = ( \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}}) + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}}[/itex]
I already knew this, but how am i supposed to compare this result to the right side? the expression on the right side is impossible to write as a sum of any sort...? At least : 2√(m+2)...

Your problem is to show that
[tex]2 \sqrt{n+1}-2 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{n+1}} \geq 2 \sqrt{n+2} - 2,\\<br /> \text{or}\\<br /> \sqrt{n+2} - \sqrt{n+1} \leq \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{n+1}}[/tex]
If I were doing it I would write
[tex]\sqrt{n+2} = \sqrt{n+1} \left( 1 + \frac{1}{n+1} \right)^{1/2}[/tex]
and go on from there.
 
  • #21
yes, i got 9/4 > 8/4! or 9>8 thanks!, now its just about proving the basecase and its finished?
 
  • #22
johann1301 said:
yes, i got 9/4 > 8/4! or 9>8 thanks!, now its just about proving the basecase and its finished?

Which message are you responding to? Please use the "Quote" button, so that the discussion can be followed accurately.
 
  • #23
Ray Vickson said:
Which message are you responding to? Please use the "Quote" button, so that the discussion can be followed accurately.

both of them :) the inequality that both of you posted implies that 9>8. Since this is true, the inequality you posted must be true ?
 
  • #24
johann1301 said:
both of them :) the inequality that both of you posted implies that 9>8. Since this is true, the inequality you posted must be true ?

I have no idea what you are talking about; we need to know something for all n (or at least, for all n larger than, say, 2 or 3), so 8 and 9 have nothing to do with the problem.
 
  • #25
johann1301 said:
both of them :) the inequality that both of you posted implies that 9>8. Since this is true, the inequality you posted must be true ?

We've invested a lot of time helping you out, so we would like to see you get the right answer. Could you post how you came to this conclusion?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #26
Ray Vickson said:
johann1301 said:
[itex]\sum_{n=1}^{m+1} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}} = ( \sum_{n=1}^{m} \frac 1{\sqrt{n}}) + \frac 1{\sqrt{m+1}}[/itex]

Your problem is to show that
[tex]2 \sqrt{n+1}-2 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{n+1}} \geq 2 \sqrt{n+2} - 2,\\<br /> \text{or}\\<br /> \sqrt{n+2} - \sqrt{n+1} \leq \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{n+1}}[/tex]

This inequality implies that 9>8. And that is certainly true, therefore the inequality that you posted must be true.
 
  • #27
[tex]2 \sqrt{n+1}-2 + \frac{1}{\sqrt{n+1}} \geq 2 \sqrt{n+2} - 2,\\<br /> \text{or}\\<br /> \sqrt{n+2} - \sqrt{n+1} \leq \frac{1}{2 \sqrt{n+1}}[/tex]

if i multiply by √n+1 on both sides, i get..

√((n+2)(n+1)) - (n+1) < 1/2

√(n2+3n+2) < (1/2) + (n+1)

√(n2+3n+2) < n+(3/2)

n2+3n+2 < (n+(3/2))2

n2+3n+2 < n2+3n+(9/4)

2 < (9/4)

(8/4) < (9/4)

8 < 9
 
  • #28
Mogarrr said:
We've invested a lot of time helping you out, so we would like to see you get the right answer. Could you post how you came to this conclusion?

You have been a great helper! Both of you have :) I believe I've learned some new tricks because of this :)
 
  • #29
johann1301 said:
Ray Vickson said:
This inequality implies that 9>8. And that is certainly true, therefore the inequality that you posted must be true.
No, this is incorrect "logic". The fact that "A implies B" and "B is true" does NOT mean "A is true".
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #30
HallsofIvy said:
johann1301 said:
No, this is incorrect "logic". The fact that "A implies B" and "B is true" does NOT mean "A is true".

So how do you show that the inequality is true?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K