MHB Proving Inscribed Angle Theorem for Triangle Side Lengths

  • Thread starter Thread starter paulmdrdo1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Triangle
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the Inscribed Angle Theorem using triangle OAB, which is identified as isosceles. The angles at the base of the triangle are derived from the relationship between the central angle BOC and the inscribed angle BAC, where BAC is half of BOC. It is established that since BOC measures 30 degrees, BAC must be 15 degrees. Participants seek clarification on the isosceles nature of the triangle and the reasoning behind the angle measurements. The discussion emphasizes the geometric properties of inscribed angles in relation to central angles.
paulmdrdo1
Messages
382
Reaction score
0
I already found the side lengths that's being asked in the problem. But the part that I'm having difficulty is the Proving part. Can you help me do that? Thanks!
 

Attachments

  • trigo2.jpg
    trigo2.jpg
    36.1 KB · Views: 95
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Triangle $OAB$ is isosceles, so what must the other two angles be?
 
There is another way of seeing this that proves in one single argument.

Notice that $BOC$ is the angle seen from the center of the arc, while $BAC$ is an angle seen from the circumference covering the same arc. This means that $BAC$ is half the angle $BOC$, therefore $BAC = 15^{\circ}$.

Sorry for barging in. :)

Best wishes.
 
MarkFL said:
Triangle $OAB$ is isosceles, so what must the other two angles be?

how did you know that it's an isosceles triangle?

- - - Updated - - -

Fantini said:
There is another way of seeing this that proves in one single argument.

Notice that $BOC$ is the angle seen from the center of the arc, while $BAC$ is an angle seen from the circumference covering the same arc. This means that $BAC$ is half the angle $BOC$, therefore $BAC = 15^{\circ}$.

Sorry for barging in. :)

Best wishes.

I didn't get it. Can you please elaborate?
 
paulmdrdo said:
how did you know that it's an isosceles triangle?

$\overline{OA}$ and $\overline{OB}$ are both radii of the same circular segment, right?
 
The problem says that $ABC$ is the arc of a circumference. This means that $BAC$ is an inscribed angle in this circumference. See here.

Now look at the angle $BOC$. This is the central angle. According to the inscribed angle theorem this means that the angle $BAC$ is half the angle $BOC$. Since $BOC = 30^{\circ}$ then $BAC = 15^{\circ}$.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top