Proving Inverse Functions: Multiplicative Relationships

PFuser1232
Messages
479
Reaction score
20
Is there a way to formally prove that if ##f## and ##g## are multiplicative inverses of each other, then ##f^{-1} (x) = g^{-1} (\frac{1}{x})##?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'd start by testing a number of special cases and see what approach the trickier special cases suggest.

Simple special cases almost never suggest approaches to proof, but the tricky special cases often do.
 
MohammedRady97 said:
Is there a way to formally prove that if ##f## and ##g## are multiplicative inverses of each other, then ##f^{-1} (x) = g^{-1} (\frac{1}{x})##?

Let h be the function which takes x to 1/x. Now if f(x)g(x) = 1 for all x then f = h \circ g. Then f^{-1} = g^{-1} \circ h^{-1}. But h = h^{-1} so f^{-1} = g^{-1} \circ h as required.
 
  • Like
Likes PFuser1232
pasmith said:
Let h be the function which takes x to 1/x. Now if f(x)g(x) = 1 for all x then f = h \circ g. Then f^{-1} = g^{-1} \circ h^{-1}. But h = h^{-1} so f^{-1} = g^{-1} \circ h as required.
Perfect. Thanks!
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top