Proving Isomorphism between Vector Space and Polynomial Space

  • Thread starter Thread starter eckiller
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism Proof
eckiller
Messages
41
Reaction score
0
Let V denote the vector space that consists of all sequences {a_n} in F (field) that have only a finite number of nonzero terms a_n. Let W = P(F) (all polynomials with coefficients from field F). Define,

T: V --> W by T(s) = sum(s(i)*x^i, 0, n)

where n is the largest integer s.t. s(n) != 0. Prive that T is an isomorphism.


I see how the transformation is mapping sequences to polynomials, but I don't even see how this is onto. Based on the sequence description, there comes a time where the remaining terms of every sequence is 0:

s_n = (s1, s2, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...).

So I don't see how that will "hit" every polynomial since the polynomials given in the problem don't have the "zero after finite many terms" restriction.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
gosh this is so obvious, what to say?

you are just blocked from seeing it by some late night demon.

Recall, what is the definition of a polynomial?


In particular, what is the degree of a polynomial?

or just try to produce ontoness directly by actually writing down say,

the finite sequence that maps to the polynomial 5x^7 - x^6 +459x - 2.

then ask yourself what prevents you from doing this for any polynomial.
 
Last edited:
Is this right?

For any p in P(F), p = c0 + c1 x + ... + ck x^k

Then define T2 : W --> V by T2( c0 + c1 x + ... + ck x^k ) = (c0, c1, ...,
ck, 0, 0, ...).

Then,

T2( T( (s0, s1, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...) ) )
= T2( s0 + s1 x + ... + sn x^n )
= (s0, s1, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...)

and,

T( T2( s0 + s1 x + ... + sn x^n ) )
= T( (s0, s1, ..., sn, 0, 0, ...) )
= s0 + s1 x + ... + sn x^n

which implies T is invertible, and hence an isomorphism?
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
937
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
38
Views
6K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
14
Views
3K
Back
Top