MHB Proving isosceles using centroid and medians

  • Thread starter Thread starter slwarrior64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centroid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the isosceles triangle property using centroids and medians. By letting sides AB, AC, and BC be represented as c, b, and a respectively, the centroid properties are applied alongside Stewart's Theorem to derive an equation involving the triangle's sides. The resulting equation simplifies to $(b-c)^2 \left[ (b-c)^2-a^2 \right] =0$. The analysis reveals that the bracket fails the triangle inequality, leading to the conclusion that b must equal c, indicating that AB equals AC. The author expresses difficulty in finding a synthetic proof for this result.
slwarrior64
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I can definitely do this in the opposite direction, but
1604546092378.jpeg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Letting $AB=c$, $AC=b$ and noting that the usual property of the centroid tells us that $GC = \frac{2}{3}$ of the median from $C$ and $GB = \frac{2}{3}$ of the median from $B$ we can use Stewart's Theorem to write everything in terms of the three sides $a,b,c$. It is an involved equation requiring two squarings to get rid of all radicals. I used Wolfram Alpha to double check my computations. After simplifying everything I end up with

$(b-c)^2 \left[ (b-c)^2-a^2 \right] =0$.

The bracket fails the triangle inequality which only leaves $b=c$ or $AB=AC$. I can't see any synthetic proof.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top