MHB Proving isosceles using centroid and medians

  • Thread starter Thread starter slwarrior64
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Centroid
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the isosceles triangle property using centroids and medians. By letting sides AB, AC, and BC be represented as c, b, and a respectively, the centroid properties are applied alongside Stewart's Theorem to derive an equation involving the triangle's sides. The resulting equation simplifies to $(b-c)^2 \left[ (b-c)^2-a^2 \right] =0$. The analysis reveals that the bracket fails the triangle inequality, leading to the conclusion that b must equal c, indicating that AB equals AC. The author expresses difficulty in finding a synthetic proof for this result.
slwarrior64
Messages
22
Reaction score
0
I can definitely do this in the opposite direction, but
1604546092378.jpeg
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Letting $AB=c$, $AC=b$ and noting that the usual property of the centroid tells us that $GC = \frac{2}{3}$ of the median from $C$ and $GB = \frac{2}{3}$ of the median from $B$ we can use Stewart's Theorem to write everything in terms of the three sides $a,b,c$. It is an involved equation requiring two squarings to get rid of all radicals. I used Wolfram Alpha to double check my computations. After simplifying everything I end up with

$(b-c)^2 \left[ (b-c)^2-a^2 \right] =0$.

The bracket fails the triangle inequality which only leaves $b=c$ or $AB=AC$. I can't see any synthetic proof.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top