Proving $\left\|(A-\lambda I)^{-1}\right\|_{2}$ with Inverse of A

  • Thread starter Thread starter jschmid2
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inverse
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the relationship \(\left\|(A-\lambda I)^{-1}\right\|_{2}=\frac{1}{\min_{\lambda_{i}\in\sigma(A)}|\lambda-\lambda_{i}|}\) for a Hermitian matrix \(A\). The participants emphasize the significance of the eigenvalues \(\sigma(A)\) and the properties of the operator norm, specifically noting that \(\left\|\cdot\right\|_{2}\) is defined as the square root of the largest eigenvalue of \(A^{*}A\). The diagonalization of Hermitian matrices is also highlighted as a crucial step in understanding the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Hermitian matrices and their properties
  • Familiarity with eigenvalues and eigenvectors
  • Knowledge of operator norms, specifically \(\left\|\cdot\right\|_{2}\)
  • Basic concepts of matrix diagonalization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the spectral theorem for Hermitian matrices
  • Learn about the properties of the operator norm in linear algebra
  • Explore the implications of eigenvalue distributions on matrix inverses
  • Investigate applications of \(\left\|(A-\lambda I)^{-1}\right\|_{2}\) in stability analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, physicists, and engineers working with linear algebra, particularly those focusing on Hermitian matrices and their applications in quantum mechanics and stability analysis.

jschmid2
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Could someone please help me show that if A is Hermitian
[tex]\left\|(A-\lambda I)^{-1}\right\|_{2}=\frac{1}{min_{\lambda_{i}\in\sigma(A)}|\lambda-\lambda_{i}|}[/tex]
where [tex]\sigma(A)[/tex] denotes the eigenvalues of A.

I have figured out how to solve the norm without an inverse, but the inverse confuses me a bit.
Recall, that [tex]\left\|\cdot\right\|=\sqrt{r_{\sigma}(A^{*}A)}[/tex], which is to say the square root of the largest eigenvalue of [tex]A^{*}A[/tex].
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If A is hermitian you can diagonalize it with the eigenvalues lying along the diagonal. Think about what your expressions look like with A in that form.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 47 ·
2
Replies
47
Views
5K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
11K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K