Proving lim m(Ei) = m(E) in Measure Spaces

  • Thread starter Thread starter jem05
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measure
jem05
Messages
54
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let (X , M, m) be a certain measure space and {En} sets in M with the property:
\underline{lim} (Ek) = \overline{lim}(Ek) = E
prove that lim m(Ei) exists and = m(E) as n approaches infinity.


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


i solved the problem, if it were given that m(\bigcupEi) is stirctly less that infinity, but i don't know how to overcome that problem since that was not given.
any help is appreciated.
thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
For the finite version you've proved already, it should be enough to have the hypothesis that m\left(\bigcup_{j\geq n} E_j\right) < \infty for some sufficiently large n, because your problem isn't changed if you throw away finitely many of the E_j from the front. But the negation of this hypothesis is that m\left(\bigcup_{j\geq n} E_j\right) = \infty for every n \in \mathbb{N}, which is a little stronger. Does that help?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top