Proving Linear Dependence in a Set of Vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter ahamdiheme
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Linearly
ahamdiheme
Messages
24
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose v_1,...,v_k is a linearly dependent set. Then show that one of the vectors must be a linear combination of the others.

Homework Equations



.

The Attempt at a Solution



I have attached an attempt at the problem. Thank you for help
 

Attachments

  • Question.jpg
    Question.jpg
    6 KB · Views: 354
  • solution.jpg
    solution.jpg
    16.4 KB · Views: 394
Physics news on Phys.org
Your solution says a_1v_1+ a_2v_2+ a_3v_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n= 0 and then you go to v_1= (-1/a_1)(a_2v_2+ a_3v_3+ \cdot\cdot\cdot+ a_nv_n)

That's pretty good. The only problem is you don't know that a1 is not 0! If it is you can't solve for v1. What you DO know, from the definition of "dependent", that you didn't say is that at least one of the "ai" is NOT 0. You don't know which one but you can always say "Let "k" be such that ak is not 0". Then what?
 
Thank you. What if i say let k:ak not equal to 0
and v1 is a linear combination of v2,...,vn iff a1=ak
 
You want to show that vk is a linear combination of the rest of the vectors. IOW, that vk is a linear combination of v1, v2, ..., vk-1, vk+1, ..., vn.
 
ok, i think i get it
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Back
Top