Proving Linear Independence of u, v and w

annoymage
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement




"if u,v,w are linearly independent then au+bv+cw=0 for some a,b,c in R"

first of all is this correct?

and how do i proof if this is correct?

should i show like this,

i know 0u+0v+0w=0

so that imply that statement is true?

because 0 is in R

is this correct? to prove "for some" statement?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
annoymage said:

Homework Statement




"if u,v,w are linearly independent then au+bv+cw=0 for some a,b,c in R"
It's true. To show that it's true, look at the definition of linear independence. A similar statement, "if u,v,w are linearly dependent then au+bv+cw=0 for some a,b,c in R", is also true.
annoymage said:
first of all is this correct?

and how do i proof if this is correct?

should i show like this,

i know 0u+0v+0w=0
The equation above is true whether u, v, and w are linearly independent or linearly dependent
annoymage said:
so that imply that statement is true?

because 0 is in R

is this correct? to prove "for some" statement?
 
i see.

but (this is other question), what if it ask to show that this statement is true "If ~~~~ then ~~~~ for some ~~~"

i'm confused

example


"if a is the eigenvalue of matrix A then a is also eigenvalue for matrix B for some elementary row operation on A to B"

i don't know if my grammar is correct. anyway here's example

let A be 2x2 matrices

1. reduce A by changing row 1 to row 2
2. again reduce A by changing row 1 to row 2

that (1) and (2) are ERO so B have the same eigenvalue with A because B=A

so is that implying that "if a is the eigenvalue of matrix A then a is also eigenvalue for matrix B for some elementary row operation on A to B" is true?

is that the way to prove "for some" statement? hep T_T
 
Let's take another look at your original question, "if u,v,w are linearly independent then au+bv+cw=0 for some a,b,c in R"

What this means is that, if u, v, and w are linearly independent, then the equation au + bv + cw = 0 has at least one solution for the constants a, b, and c.

It's also true, but not stated above, that for three linearly independent vectors, there is exactly one such solution; namely, a = b = c = 0.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top