Proving Matrix Equality with Inverse Properties

ConeOfIce
Messages
13
Reaction score
0
The question is: Suppose one has n×n square matrices X, Y and Z such that
XY = I and Y Z = I. Show that it follows that X = Z.

Now if this were XY and ZY, I would just say that:

XY=ZY -> XY-ZY=0 ->Y(X-Z)=0 -> X-Z=0 -> X=Z.

I am wondering that since the Y is on different sides of the Z and X this still holds? Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't think you can just pull the Y out like that.

If I recall correctly, if XY = I, then doesn't YX = I aswell? If this is true perhaps you could encorporate it into your proof somehow.
 
Actually I think I just figured it out.
X^-1 Y =X^-1 I -> Y=X^-1

then sub that in for Y in the other equation
X^-1 Z = I
XX^-1 Z = X
Z=X

Thanks for your help!
 
it goes like this: XY = I so XYZ = IZ = Z.

but YZ = I too, so XYZ = XI = X. so X = XYZ = Z.

the problem with your argument is that there is no X^-1 unless yoiu prove this problem.

but if yu are careful, yu can use the fact that X = the left inverse of Y and Z = the right inverse of Y.
 
Oh, I forgot the inverses don't always exist...it has been a bit since I have done and linear algebra work. Your solution makes perfect sense, thanks!
 
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top