Proving Matrix Equations: Cramer's Rule, Transpose & Adjoint

  • Thread starter Thread starter daniel_i_l
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices Proofs
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion centers on proving matrix equations using Cramer's Rule, the properties of determinants, and the definition of the adjoint. The conclusions drawn are: (a) True, as Cramer's Rule confirms that the solution vector will consist of integers when the determinant of matrix A is 2 and vector b contains even integers; (b) False, since the determinant properties indicate that if n is odd, the matrix A cannot be invertible, leading to a non-trivial solution for Ax=0; (c) True, as the adjoint of a scaled matrix follows the established relationship of adj(gammaA) = gamma^(n-1) * adj(A).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Cramer's Rule
  • Knowledge of matrix determinants and their properties
  • Familiarity with the concept of adjoint matrices
  • Basic linear algebra concepts, particularly regarding square matrices
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Cramer's Rule in solving linear equations
  • Explore properties of determinants in odd-dimensional matrices
  • Investigate the derivation and applications of the adjoint matrix
  • Learn about matrix invertibility conditions and implications in linear algebra
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, particularly those studying linear algebra, matrix theory, and anyone involved in solving matrix equations or proofs related to determinants and adjoints.

daniel_i_l
Gold Member
Messages
864
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove or disprove the following:
(A is a nxn square matrix)
a) The vector b is in R^n and all its elements are even integers. If all the elements of the A are integers and det(A) = 2, then the equation Ax = b has a solution with only integer elements
b) If n is odd and transpose(A) = -A then the equation Ax=0 has only one solution
c)adj(gammaA) = gamma^n-1adj(A) if gamma is in R.


Homework Equations


a) Cramer's rule.
b) det(transpose(A)) = det(A)
det(-A) = (-1)^ndet(A)
c) definition of adjoint (transpose of cofactor matrix)


The Attempt at a Solution



a)True: according to Cramer's rule each element of the solution is the determinant of A with one coloum replaced by b divided by det(A). Since the determinant can be taken with coloum b the first determinant will be the sum of even numbers (because all of b's elements are even and A's are integers) and that divided by |A|=2 will be an integer.

b)False: |transpose(A)| = |A|. |-A| = (-1)^nA = -|A| cause n is odd. So 2|A|=0 => |A|=0 and A isn't reversable so it must have a non trivial solution to Ax=0.

c)True: because each element of adj(gammaA) is +/-1 times a determinant of gamma * (a n-1xn-1 matrix) which equals gamma^n-1 times the determinant of the n-1xn-1 matrix.

Are the answers right? I'm especially hesitant about c).
Thanks!
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
They seem just fine to me.
 
Thanks a lot!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
5K
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K