Proving Roots of f(x) with Odd n ≤ 3

  • Thread starter Thread starter Neoma
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
AI Thread Summary
For the function f(x) = x^n + px + q, where n is an odd natural number, it is established that f has at least one real root due to its behavior at positive and negative extremes. The intermediate value theorem is a key consideration for proving the existence of one root, although expressing the necessary x-values in terms of n, p, and q poses challenges. To demonstrate that f has at most three real roots, analyzing the local extrema by setting f'(x) = 0 is essential, with different cases for the sign of p providing clarity on the number of extrema. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the dominant term of f(x) as x approaches infinity and negative infinity. Ultimately, the problem is resolved through careful consideration of these factors.
Neoma
Messages
9
Reaction score
0
Let n \ \epsilon \ \mathbb{N}, \ n \geq 2 and p, \ q \ \epsilon \ \mathbb{R}. Consider f: \ \mathbb{R} \ \rightarrow \ \mathbb{R} defined by f(x)=x^{n}+px+q.

Suppose n is odd, prove that f has at least one and at most three real roots.

I thought about the intermediate value theorem for proving that f has one root, but then you need one x where f is negative and another one where it's positive and it's impossible to expres this x in terms of n, p and q.

To prove that f has at most three real roots, I thought about finding the local extrema (where f'(x)=0) and examining each of the possible combinations of positions of them. However, then I'm kinda facing the same problem. I'm sure there has to be some more elegant way.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Neoma said:
Let n \ \epsilon \ \mathbb{N}, \ n \geq 2 and p, \ q \ \epsilon \ \mathbb{R}. Consider f: \ \mathbb{R} \ \rightarrow \ \mathbb{R} defined by f(x)=x^{n}+px+q.

Suppose n is odd, prove that f has at least one and at most three real roots.

I thought about the intermediate value theorem for proving that f has one root, but then you need one x where f is negative and another one where it's positive and it's impossible to expres this x in terms of n, p and q.
You have the right idea. For large absolute values of x, what is the dominant term of f(x)? In other words, what is the limit of f(x) as x goes to infinity, minus infinity?

To prove that f has at most three real roots, I thought about finding the local extrema (where f'(x)=0) and examining each of the possible combinations of positions of them. However, then I'm kinda facing the same problem. I'm sure there has to be some more elegant way.
Again, you are using the right approach by considering the equation f'(x) = 0. Consider separately the cases when p is positive, negative, and zero. In each case, how many real roots can f'(x) = 0 have?
 
Thanks, I solved it.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top