Proving S^n = 0 using Shift Operator Properties

TranscendArcu
Messages
277
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg810/scaled.php?server=810&filename=screenshot20120131at923.png&res=medium

The Attempt at a Solution


So in particular I want to look at the last part of this problem. That is, "Show that S^n = 0"

I know that dim(KerS^k) = k and therefore, dim(ImS^k)= n-k. If k=n, dim(ImS^k)= n- n = 0 which implies that ImS^k = \left\{ 0 \right\}.

I'm having trouble drawing from this the conclusion that S^n = 0. Is S an isomorphism? If so, does that mean that the only thing that can map to 0 in the codomain is 0 in the domain?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
You mean ImS^n = \left\{ 0 \right\}. That means for all vectors x, S^n(x)=0. Doesn't that mean S^n=0? Of course S isn't an isomorphism! It has a nonzero kernel. Not sure what's bothering you here.
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top