Proving Sequence Convergence: Tips & Tricks

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
5 replies · 2K views
estro
Messages
239
Reaction score
0
I know that the sequences meets the following:
[tex](n+1)(a_{n+1}-a_n)=n(a_{n-1}-a_n)[/tex]
I've got the feeling that this sequence is alternating or decreasing, but I was unable to prove it.
Usually I use induction to prove things about such inductive sequence but in this case I don't have real values t o the first terms of the sequence so I don't have an idea how to even begin inductive prove.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I have found this question in an old exam, so maybe there is some kind of mistake, I'm not sure.
[tex] (n+1)(a_{n+1}-a_n)=n(a_{n-1}-a_n)[/tex]
[EDIT] Copied question in a wrong way, now fixed.
 
Still can't see a benefit to define [tex]b_m=a_{n+1}-a_n[/tex].
I've used to prove convergence of alternating sequences by using Cantor's Lemma in a geometric formulation.
Marked each section [tex][a_{n+1},a_n][/tex] and then I proved that each next section smaller and ultimately the length of a sections is going to 0.
But I always had the first terms and used induction to prove sequences is bounded.
But here all these tricks don't work as I can't even prove that this sequence is alternating.
 
If you let [itex]b_n = a_n - a_{n-1}[/itex] then your relation is transformed into [tex]\frac{b_{n+1}}{b_n} = \frac{n}{n+1} < 1[/tex].