Proving SHM in a System of Electric Charges

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that a particle with charge -q, placed between two fixed positive charges +Q, undergoes simple harmonic motion (SHM) when displaced slightly. The force acting on the particle is derived from the contributions of both charges, leading to a restoring force that is proportional to the displacement. Key approximations include treating the angle as small to simplify the sine and tangent functions. The final period of SHM is expressed as T = (ε₀ m π³ d³ / qQ)^(1/2), confirming the relationship between the system's parameters. The conversation emphasizes the importance of symmetry and the correct application of forces in deriving the SHM characteristics.
stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
Two postitive charges +Q are held at fixed distance d from each other. A particle of charge -q is placed at the mid point between them and given a small displacement y, on the line perpendicular to the line joining them and released. Show that hte particle described SHM of period (\frac{\epsilon_{0} m \pi^3 d^3}{qQ})^\frac{1}{2}

i drew a figure of what this might look like.

I was wondering if i had to prove that this particle is going to undergo SHM. I can easily say that at points +y and -y the force on the particle is the maximum and is \pm \frac{Qqd}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0} tan^2 \theta}

would i then simply plug the acceleration of this force into th4e SHM equation??

But how would i get rid of the tan theta?? I doesn't appear in the answer they want.. after all.
 

Attachments

  • charge.JPG
    charge.JPG
    5 KB · Views: 1,189
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't you just replace tan(theta) with (d/2)/y?
 
that would produce a y in the final answer. Look at hteh answer i want. I doesn't have any Ys involved in it. Thats why tan theta cannot be replaced like that
 
The force from each charge has two components. Using symmetry arguments you can see the vertical components cancel out, and that the horizontal components (the y-components) of the two forces from the two charges add up. Let psi be the angle between the diagonal and the vertical axis (it seems to be a more convenient angle to work from than theta).

To find the y-components of the forces, we need to make two approximations: 1.) because the distance y is small, the change in the distance r between q and each Q will not change much from d/2; 2.) the force component in the y-direction is F*sin(psi), and for small angles sin(psi) = psi. (Zoom in on the portion of the sin(x) vs. x curve around the origin and you'll see it resembles a line with slope 1 crossing the origin). So F*sin(psi) ~ F*psi. Don't forget to change psi to the distance y that it corresponds to.

The equation for simple harmonic motion is

m*a - (restoring force) = 0

where the restoring force is proportional to x (else it wouldn't be "simple"). If you do the algebra with F*psi you'll find you get some expression that's proportional to y. Let that expression be k. According to formulas about SHM, the angular velocity omega is equal to sqrt(m/k), and the period is equal to 2pi/omega. Do the algebra, and you should end up with the right answer.
 
ok let's see

force on each end of the Y axis (horizontal as in the diagram) would be due to both charges

F = \frac{2}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Qq}{y^2}

F = \frac{1}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Qq}{y^2}

the acceleration due to this forcei s
a = \frac{Qq}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} y^2 m}

plugging into ma - ky = 0 where k is restoring force

k = \frac{Qq}{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} y^3}

T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{m}{k}}

T = 2 \pi \sqrt{\frac{2 \pi \epsilon_{0} y^3 m}{Qq}}

T = \sqrt{\frac{8 \epsilon_{0} m \pi^3 y^3}{Qq}}
now y = \frac{d}{2} \tan{\theta}

T = \sqrt{\frac{\epsilon_{0} m \pi^3 d^3 \tan^3{\psi}}{Qq}}}

how do i eliminate the tan psi?? do i use the assumption that tan psi = 1 for small angles??
 
Last edited:
stunner5000pt said:
ok let's see

force on each end of the Y axis (horizontal as in the diagram) would be due to both charges

F = \frac{2}{4 \pi \epsilon_{0}} \frac{Qq}{y^2}
Actually, it should be divided by r^2 = y^2 + (d/2)^2 ~ (d/2)^2.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top